THE INFORMATION AND DATA LITERACY OF PROSPECTIVE PRE-SERVICE ELEMENTARY EDUCATION TEACHERS: A SURVEY
Abstract
Abstract: Digital literacy is a fundamental ability that must be possessed by teachers in the era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Society 5.0. Teachers who have good digital skills will be able to present realistic, actual, and interesting learning. This study argues if digital literacy has been internalized in the learning process of pre-service teachers, students they will also be familiar with digital literacy activities. Thus, they can improve the digital literacy skills of their students when they later teach in primary schools. This study aims to analyze the literacy skills of primary school pre-service teachers in information and data literacy. The method used is a survey method, with a single data tabulation data analysis technique. The data collection was carried out by providing an online questionnaire via a google form to pre-service teachers who were in their 6th semester of the Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (Islamic primary schools) Teacher Education Study Program, at one Islamic state university in East Java, Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the pre-service teachers’ digital literacy skills in the index of data and information literacy are at a good level. Implications and limitations of the study as well as suggestions will also be discussed in the presentation.
Keywords: digital literacy, prospective pre-service teachers, information, data literacyFull Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Anisimova, E. S. (2020). ‘Digital literacy of future preschool teachers’, Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(1), pp. 230–253.
Beneke, M. R. (2020). ‘Teacher Candidates Talking (but Not Talking) About Dis / ability and Race in Preschool’. doi: 10.1177/1086296X20939561.
Cem, N. (2020). ‘Analysis of Digital Literacy and Metaphoric Perceptions of Teacher Candidate’, International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(1), pp. 135–145. doi: 10.12973/ijem.6.1.135.
Creswell, W. J. and Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative adn Mixed Methods Approaches, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. Available at: file:///C:/Users/Harrison/Downloads/John W. Creswell & J. David Creswell - Research Design_ Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2018).pdf%0Afile:///C:/Users/Harrison/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Creswell, Cr.
Derby, M., Macfarlane, A. and Gillon, G. (2020). ‘Early literacy and child well-being: Exploring the efficacy of a home-based literacy intervention on children’ s foundational literacy skills’. doi: 10.1177/1468798420955222.
EROL, S. and AYDIN, E. (2021) ‘Digital Literacy Status of Turkish Teachers’, International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(2). doi: 10.15345/iojes.2021.02.020.
Ghufron, M. (2018) ‘Revolusi Industri 4.0: Tantangan, Peluang, Dan Solusi Bagi Dunia Pendidikan’, Seminar Nasional dan Diskusi Panel Multidisiplin Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2018, 1(1), pp. 332–337.
Greenwood, C. R. et al. (2017). ‘Development, Validation, and Evaluation of Literacy 3D: A Package Supporting Tier 1 Preschool Literacy Instruction Implementation and Intervention’. doi: 10.1177/0271121416652103.
Hikida, M. et al. (2019). ‘Reviewing How Preservice Teachers Are Prepared to Teach Reading Processes: What the Literature Suggests and Overlooks’. doi: 10.1177/1086296X19833297.
KOMINFO. (2020). ‘Status Literasi Digital Indonesia di 34 Propinsi’, (November).
Önger, S. (2018). ‘An investigation into digital literacy views of social studies preservice teachers in the context of authentic learning’, Review of International Geographical Education Online, 8(1), pp. 109–124. Available at: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/ scopus_id/85049131495.
Pu, M. and Yang, H. (2021). ‘Research on the Cultivation of Students’ Information Literacy Ability Based on Large Data Analysis under the Current Situation of Network Media Research on the Cultivation of Students ’ Information Literacy Ability Based on Large Data Analysis under the’, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1744/3/032187.
Rahman, A. and Nuryana, Z. (2019). ‘Pendidikan Islam di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0’, pp. 34–0. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/8xwp6.
Rolón-dow, R. et al. (2021). ‘Racial literacy theory into practice : teacher candidates ’ responses Racial literacy theory into practice : teacher candidates ’ responses’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 34(7), pp. 663–679. doi: 10.1080/ 09518398.2020.1783013.
Rosenthal, J. et al. (2017). ‘Children’s Literacy Growth, and Candidates’ and Teachers’ Professional Development Resulting from a PDS-Based Initial Certification Literacy Course.’, School-University Partnerships, 10(1), pp. 57–65.
Rusydiyah, E. F., Purwati, E. and Prabowo, A. (2020). ‘How to use digital literacy as a learning resource for teacher candidates in Indonesia’, Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(2), pp. 305–318. doi: 10.21831/cp.v39i2.30551.
Sabri, I. (2019). ‘Peran Pendidikan Seni Di Era Society 5. 0 untuk Revolusi Industri 4.0’, Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana 2019, 2(1), pp. 342–347. Available at: https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snpasca/article/view/302.
Schroeder, S. and Curcio, R. (2022). ‘Critiquing, Curating, and Adapting: Cultivating 21st-Century Critical Curriculum Literacy With Teacher Candidates’. doi: 10.1177/00224871221075279.
Sural, S. and Dedebali, N. C. (2018). ‘European Journal of Educational Research’, 7(2), pp. 303–317. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.303.
Themes, K. E. Y. T. O. (2013). ‘Literacy across the Curriculum’, Literacy across the Curriculum. doi: 10.18848/978-1-61229-143-7/cgp.
Tootell, H., Freeman, M. and Freeman, A. (2014). ‘Generation alpha at the intersection of technology, play and motivation’, Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 82–90. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.19.
Turgut, D. and Yakar, Z. (2020). ‘Does Teacher Education Program Affect on Development of Teacher Candidates’ Bioethical Values, Scientific Literacy Levels and Empathy Skills?’, International Education Studies, 13(5), p. 80. doi: 10.5539/ies.v13n5p80.
UNESCO (2018). ‘A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy’, (51).
Yamaç, A. and Öztürk, E. (2019). ‘How Digital Reading Differs from Traditional Reading: An Action Research’, International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(3), pp. 207–222. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2019.193.15.
Zelyurt, H. (2021). ‘An Analysis of Prospective Teachers’ Curriculum Literacy Levels in Terms of Various Variables’, Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(3). doi: 10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.342.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 2598-0653