Building Integrity in Research: Indicators of Commitment to Scientific Ethics

Mohammed A H Shehada, Ahmad Nurabadi

Abstract


This article seeks to provide a comprehensive examination of the indicators of commitment to scientific ethics in research practices, the variability of these indicators across disciplines, the factors influencing ethical commitment, institutional strategies for monitoring integrity, and the role of training in fostering ethical adherence. By addressing these critical areas, the research will contribute to the ongoing discourse on enhancing ethical standards in scientific inquiry. The methodology for the article “Building Integrity in Research: Indicators of Commitment to Scientific Ethics” is designed to systematically explore the key indicators of adherence to scientific ethics in research practices. This section outlines the research design, data collection methods, analysis techniques, and ethical considerations that guided the study. the findings from this study highlight the importance of identifying key indicators of commitment to scientific ethics and understanding their variability across disciplines.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737

Armond, A., Gordijn, B., Lewis, J., Hosseini, M., Bodnár, J., Holm, S., & Kakuk, P. (2021). A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases. BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00620-8

Brittain, S., Ibbett, H., Lange, E., Dorward, L., Hoyte, S., Marino, A., & Lewis, J. (2020). Ethical considerations when conservation research involves people. Conservation Biology, 34(4), 925-933. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13464

Kretser, A., Murphy, D., Bertuzzi, S., Abraham, T., Allison, D., Boor, K., & Yada, R. (2019). Scientific integrity principles and best practices: Recommendations from a scientific integrity consortium. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(2), 327-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3

Guerrero-Dib, J., Portales, L., & Escorza, Y. (2020). Impact of academic integrity on workplace ethical behaviour. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-0051-3

Bonn, N., & Pinxten, W. (2021). Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — A multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00105-z

Strech, D., Weissgerber, T., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). Improving the trustworthiness, usefulness, and ethics of biomedical research through an innovative and comprehensive institutional initiative. PLOS Biology, 18(2), e3000576. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000576

Sivasubramaniam, S., Dlabolová, D., Kralikova, V., & Khan, Z. (2021). Assisting you to advance with ethics in research: An introduction to ethical governance and application procedures. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00078-6

McNutt, M., Bradford, M., Drazen, J., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K., & Verma, I. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2557-2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This proceeding series is indexed by:

ipiii.pnggoogle.png

ISSN: 2987-2448