Paradigma Pendidikan Era Learning Society 5.0: Model STEAM sebagai Internasional Best Practice dalam Smart Education
Abstract
Abstract: The era of the industrial revolution which has now reached 5.0 demands changes in all aspects marked by the use of digital technology. This research aims to prepare education for the era of learning society 5.0 in the challenges of new paradigms in the context of the 21st century skill picture which can later be of long-term benefit to be able to improve the quality of education and unite international level education and the application of modern technology as a whole at various levels of education that have also implemented best practices for learning models in a related educational institution. Researchers use a type of literature study approach by applying the literature review method to be able to get the latest information and quality data with the most accurate and reliable sources. Data that has been collected and neatly arranged will soon be analyzed using systematic steps, including identifying research topics, determining the focus of literature, searching for research supporting sources, assessing the quality of sources, presenting research results, and drawing conclusions. There are four research results of the educational paradigm of the learning society 5.0 era, including: (a) International best practices in education; (b) Changes in the role of educators; (c) Optimization of smart education; and (d) Implementation of the STEAM model.
Keywords: educational paradigm, learning society 5.0, STEAM model, international best practice, smart education
Abstrak: Era revolusi industri yang kini sudah mencapai 5.0 menuntut adanya perubahan dalam segala aspek ditandai dengan adanya pemanfaatan teknologi digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mempersiapkan pendidikan era learning society 5.0 dalam tantangan-tantangan paradigma baru pada konteks gambaran keterampilan abad ke-21 yang nantinya dapat bermanfaat jangka panjang untuk dapat meningkatkan mutu pendidikan serta menyatukan pendidikan tingkat internasional dan penerapan teknologi modern secara menyeluruh diberbagai jenjang pendidikan yang juga sudah mengimplementasikan best practice untuk model-model pembelajaran di suatu lembaga pendidikan terkait. Peneliti menggunakan jenis pendekatan studi pustaka dengan menerapkan metode literature review untuk bisa mendapatkan informasi terbaru serta data yang berkualitas dengan sumbersumber terakurat dan terpercaya. Data yang sudah terkumpul dan tertata rapi akan segera dilakukan analisis dengan menggunakan langkah-langkah sistematis antara lain adalah melakukan identifikasi topik penelitian, menentukan fokus dari literatur, pencarian sumber-sumber penunjang penelitian, penilaian kualitas sumber, penyajian hasil penelitian, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Terdapat empat hasil penelitian paradigma pendidikan era learning society 5.0 antara lain: (a) Internasional best practice dalam pendidikan; (b) Perubahan peran pendidik; (c) Optimalisasi smart education; dan (d) Implementasi model STEAM.
Kata kunci: paradigma pendidikan, learning society 5.0, model STEAM, internasional best practice, smart education
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andrews, R., & Van Bergen, P. (2020). Characteristics of educators’ talk about decontextualised events. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939120966080 Anggraeni, R. E., & Suratno. (2021). The analysis of the development of the 5E-STEAM learning model to improve critical thinking skills in natural science lesson. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1832(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012050 Apriyani, Y., Supriyati, Y., & Margono, G. (2021). The Influence of Learning Models on Scientific Literacy in Physics Course: A Meta-Analysis Research. International Journal of Science and Society, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v3i4.392 Bairašauskienė, L. (2021). School Management Change in The Context of Educational Management Paradigms Shift. Tiltai, 80(2). https://doi.org/10.15181/tbb.v79i2.1783 Bataeva, E. V. (2019). Cognitive and metacognitive skills of students in the context of smart-education. Obrazovanie i Nauka, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-4-36-59 Buenvinida, L. P., Rodriguez, M. T. M., & Sapin, S. B. (2020). 21ST Century Characteristics of Educators as Perceived by Laguna State Polytechnic University Faculty. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.74.8190 Chen Candidate, T.-I. (2021). a Study on the Influence of Learner Characteristics, Educator Characteristics and Learning Strategies on Learning Satisfaction in E-Learning. The International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 14(1). Chujitarom, W., & Piriyasurawong, P. (2019). The effect of the STEAM-GAAR field learning model to Enhance Grit. TEM Journal, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM81-36 Cunningham, I. (2020). A new educational paradigm for the 21st century. In Development and Learning in Organizations (Vol. 34, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-10-2019-0253
Dare, E. A., Keratithamkul, K., Hiwatig, B. M., & Li, F. (2021). Beyond content: The role of stem disciplines, realworld problems, 21st century skills, and stem careers within science teachers’ conceptions of integrated stem education. Education Sciences, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110737 Egan, A., Maguire, R., Christophers, L., & Rooney, B. (2017). Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.12.004 El Janati, S., Maach, A., & El Ghanami, D. (2018). SMART education framework for adaptation content presentation. Procedia Computer Science, 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.141 Elnagar, A., & Young, J. (2021). International Education and the Internationalization of Public Schooling in Canada: Approaches and Conceptualizations. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 195. https://doi.org/10.7202/1075674AR Franklin, T. J. (2015). Embracing the Future: Empowering the 21st Century Educator. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.584 Garashchuk, O., & Kutsenko, V. (2021). State competitiveness and sustainable development in the context of the new educational paradigm. Herald of Economics, 1(99). https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2021.01.008 Girotto, L. C., Enns, S. C., De Oliveira, M. S., Mayer, F. B., Perotta, B., Santos, I. S., & Tempski, P. (2019). Preceptors’ perception of their role as educators and professionals in a health system. BMC Medical Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1642-7 Guo, X. R., Li, X., & Guo, Y. M. (2021). Mapping knowledge domain analysis in smart education research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313234 Hashim, H. (2018). Application of Technology in the Digital Era Education. International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24036/002za0002 Hoel, T., & Mason, J. (2018). Standards for smart education – towards a development framework. Smart Learning Environments, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0052-3 Kiryakova, G., Angelova, N., & Yordanova, L. (2018). The potential of augmented reality to transform education into Smart education. TEM Journal, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM73-11 Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4 Kummanee, J., Nilsook, P., Piriyasurawong, P., & Wannapiroon, P. (2020). STEAM Gamification Learning Model to Enhance Vocational Students’ Creativity and Innovation Skills. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1135 AISC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40271-6_68 Kunst, S., & Degkwitz, A. (2019). Open Science-the new paradigm for research and education? In Information Services and Use (Vol. 38, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-180014 Lin, C. L., & Tsai, C. Y. (2021). The Effect of a Pedagogical STEAM Model on Students’ Project Competence and Learning Motivation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09885-x Liu, T., & Zheng, H. (2021). A study of digital interactive technology and design mode promoting the learners’ metacognitive experience in smart education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.10.1555 Malan, S. (2010). The “new paradigm” of outcomes-based education in perspective. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences /Tydskrif Vir Gesinsekologie En Verbruikerswetenskappe, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.4314/jfecs.v28i1.52788 Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2019). The Teaching Factory Network: A new collaborative paradigm for manufacturing education. Procedia Manufacturing, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.062 Mengmeng, Z., Xiantong, Y., & Xinghua, W. (2019). Construction of STEAM Curriculum Model and Case Design in Kindergarten. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.12691/education7-7-8 Minhas, D. S., Shahid, A., & Ali, U. (2021). Covid-19 and Emergence of New Educational Paradigm. Journal of Peace, Development & Communication, Volume 5(1). https://doi.org/10.36968/jpdc-v05-i01-18
Morrison-Saunders, A., Arts, J., Bond, A., Pope, J., & Retief, F. (2021). Reflecting on, and revising, international best practice principles for EIA follow-up. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106596 Mufida, S. N., Sigit, D. V., & Ristanto, R. H. (2020). Integrated project-based e-learning with science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (PjBeL-STEAM): its effect on science process skills. Biosfer, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v13n2.183-200 Ngah, R., Junid, J., & Osman, C. A. (2019). The links between role of educators, self-directed learning, constructivist learning environment and entrepreneurial endeavor: Technology entrepreneurship pedagogical approach. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.11.25 Nithyanantham, V., Paulmony, R., & Ramadan Hasan, S. (2019). Self-Perspective of 21st Century Educators: A Challenge in The Globalised Educational World. International Journal of Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.573869 Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03743 Poole, A. (2019). International Education Teachers’ Experiences as an Educational Precariat in China. Journal of Research in International Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240919836489 Rahmawati, Y., Taylor, E., Taylor, P. C., Ridwan, A., & Mardiah, A. (2022). Students’ Engagement in Education as Sustainability: Implementing an Ethical Dilemma-STEAM Teaching Model in Chemistry Learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063554 Ramia, G. (2021). Crises in international education, and government responses: a comparative analysis of racial discrimination and violence towards international students. Higher Education, 82(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00684-w Rudenko, E., Sagajdachnaya, E., & Shamraeva, K. (2021). Motivational component of educational activity in the context of a new educational network paradigm. E3S Web of Conferences, 273. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127312063 Rusilowati, A., Ulya, E. D., & Sumpono, I. (2020). STEAM-deaf learning model assisted by rube goldberg machine for deaf student in junior special needs school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042087 Sa’ida, N. (2021). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran STEAM pada Pembelajaran Daring. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Hasil Penelitian, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v7n2.p123-128 Sari, P. N., Jumadi, & Ekayanti, A. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math) untuk Penguatan Literasi-Numerasi Siswa. Jurnal Abdimas Indonesia, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.53769/jai.v1i2.90 Seikkula-Leino, J., Jónsdóttir, S. R., Håkansson-Lindqvist, M., Westerberg, M., & Eriksson-Bergström, S. (2021). Responding to global challenges through education: Entrepreneurial, sustainable, and proenvironmental education in nordic teacher education curricula. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212808 Singh, H., & Miah, S. J. (2020). Smart education literature: A theoretical analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10116-4 Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 Walker, T. R., McGuinty, E., & Hickman, D. (2021). Marine debris database development using international best practices: A case study in Vietnam. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112948 Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review. Computers and Education, 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818 Wang, X., Wilson, J., & Li, W. (2021). An empirical investigation of leadership and human resources capacities as key actors in the implementation of smart education. Education Sciences, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030138
Wittayakhom, N., & Piriyasurawong, P. (2020). Learning Management STEAM Model on Massive Open Online Courses Using Augmented Reality to Enhance Creativity and Innovation. Higher Education Studies, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n4p44 Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. In Journal of Planning Education and Research (Vol. 39, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971 Zaman, S. A., & Ghosh, S. (2021). A generic input–output approach in developing and optimizing an Aspen plus steam-gasification model for biomass. Bioresource Technology, 337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125412 Zayyinah, Z., Erman, E., Supardi, Z. A. I., Hariyono, E., & Prahani, B. K. (2022). STEAM-Integrated Project Based Learning Models: Alternative to Improve 21st Century Skills. Proceedings of the Eighth Southeast Asia Design Research (SEA-DR) & the Second Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture, and Humanity (STEACH) International Conference (SEADR-STEACH 2021), 627. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211229.039 Zhang, Y., Qin, G., Cheng, L., Marimuthu, K., & Kumar, B. S. (2021). Interactive smart educational system using ai for students in the higher education platform. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing, 36(1). Zhu, Z., Sun, Y., & Riezebos, P. (2016). Introducing the smart education framework: core elements for successful learning in a digital world. International Journal of Smart Technology and Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsmarttl.2016.078159 Zhu, Z. T., Yu, M. H., & Riezebos, P. (2016). A research framework of smart education. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This proceeding series is indexed by:
