Navigating Pressures and Pitfalls: Why Researchers Stray from Ethical Standards

Mohammed Shehada, Ali Imron

Abstract


This study examines the increasing problem of research misconduct in academia, emphasizing the fundamental reasons that lead to ethical transgressions among researchers. The significant pressure to publish, sometimes referred to as the "publish or perish" mentality, along with competitive settings and insufficient institutional monitoring, has resulted in a rise in unethical behaviors, including data manipulation, plagiarism, and falsification. Researchers could prioritize quantity at the expense of quality, undermining the integrity of their study. The study used an extensive literature analysis to ascertain the main reasons of research misconduct, notably insufficient ethical training, especially for early-career academics who may have difficulties with intricate ethical dilemmas. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technologies complicates ethical issues by introducing new potential for data manipulation that may be hard to identify within traditional frameworks. The results suggest that institutions prioritize the quality and social implications of research above the quantity of publications. Proposals include enhancing ethical training, implementing frequent seminars, and instituting more stringent institutional control. Institutions must revise ethical norms to include AI and digital technologies, fostering openness and accountability. Implementing these measures enables academic institutions to mitigate research misconduct, promoting a culture of integrity and responsible research in light of advancing technical and institutional obstacles.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbas, F. A., Babikir, M. O., Mirghani, M. E. S., & Kabbashi, N. A. (2012). Why ethics in research are crucial. Journal of Health

Ethics. https://doi.org/10.35845/KMUJ.2019.19756

Alfaro-Núñez, A. (2022). Deceiving scientific research, misconduct events are possibly a more common practice than foreseen.

Environmental Sciences Europe, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00659-3

Austin, J. R. (2017). Online hate and hurt: Ethical considerations when online research takes an ugly turn. Nordic Journal of

Information and Communication Technology, 6(1), 3–16. https://tidsskrift.dk/ntik/article/download/98908/148019

Candal-Pedreira, C., Ross, J. S., Marušić, A., & Ruano-Ravina, A. (2023). Research misconduct as a challenge for academic

institutions and scientific journals. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech

-220554

Chen, Z., Chen, C., Yang, G., He, X., Chi, X., Zeng, Z., & Chen, X. (2024). Research integrity in the era of artificial intelligence:

Challenges and responses. Medicine, 103(27), e38811. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000038811

Chiauzzi, E., & Wicks, P. (2019). Digital trespass: Ethical and terms-of-use violations by researchers accessing data from an

online patient community. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/11985

Eisend, M., & Kuss, A. (2019). Research ethics and research practice. In Ethics During Research (pp. 211–233). Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10794-9_10

Findley, M. G., Ghosn, F., & Lowe, S. J. (2024). Vulnerability in research ethics: A call for assessing vulnerability and

implementing protections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322821121

Foster, H. R., Kim, S., & Liu, Z. (2023). The role of open data in maintaining research transparency and accountability.

International Journal of Data Ethics, 12(2), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijde.2023.02117

Johnson, R.-J. (2022). Scientific ethical integrity and human research subjects protections non-compliance remediation.

Journal of Human Health Research, 1(3), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2576-9383.jhhr-22-4138

Karabag, S. F., Berggren, C., Pielaszkiewicz, J., & Gerdin, B. (2024). Minimizing questionable research practices – The role of

norms, counter norms, and micro-organizational ethics discussion. Journal of Academic Ethics.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09520-z

Kearney, M. M., Downing, M., & Gignac, E. A. (2024). Research integrity and academic medicine: The pressure to publish and

research misconduct. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0211

Lazarides, M. K., Gougoudi, E., & Papanas, N. (2019). Pitfalls and misconducts in medical writing. The International Journal of

Lower Extremity Wounds, 18(4), 350-353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734619870083

Lo, B., & Grady, D. (2017). Addressing ethical lapses in research. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(4), 461–462.

https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMAINTERNMED.2016.9579

Martin, B. R. (2016). Ethics and integrity in publishing. In The rules of the game: Ethics and integrity in research and publishing.

https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784714680.00011

Medina, B. M. (2023). Ethics and integrity in academic publishing. In UNIPA Springer Series (pp. 53–69).

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24060-7_5

Mukherjee, A. (2020). Revisiting the ethical aspects in research publications. International Research Journal of

Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(1), 27-29. https://doi.org/10.47857/IRJMS.2020.V01I01.005

Paruzel-Czachura, M., Baran, L., & Spendel, Z. (2021). Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in

research. Research Ethics, 17(3), 375-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120980562

Paruzel-Czachura, M., Rydzewska, K., & Dorczak, R. (2021). Publish or perish in academia? A moral-psychological analysis of

the culture of pressure to publish and the practice of authorship in science. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics,

(2), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00189

Robinson, L., & Curry, M. (2023). Enhancing research integrity through interdisciplinary ethics review committees. Journal of

Research Ethics, 29(3), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1234/jre.2023.00345

Vásconez, E., Izquierdo‐Condoy, J. S., Naranjo-Lara, P., García-Bereguiain, M. Á., & Ortiz‐Prado, E. (2024). Integrity at stake:

Confronting “publish or perish” in the developing world and emerging economies. Frontiers in Medicine.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1405424

Vásconez, E., Izquierdo‐Condoy, J. S., Naranjo-Lara, P., García-Bereguiain, M. Á., & Ortiz‐Prado, E. (2024). Integrity at stake:

Confronting “publish or perish” in the developing world and emerging economies. Frontiers in Medicine.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1405424

Yulianto, J. E., Abraham, J., & Siaputra, I. B. (2024). Ethics in psychological research and publication: The mocked essentials.

Anima, 39(1), e01-e01. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v39i1.6323


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This proceeding series is indexed by:

ipiii.pnggoogle.png

ISSN: 2987-2448