Kepimpinan Ketua Panitia Sekolah Rendah: Satu Tinjauan Elemen Kepimpinan

Zaliza Md Yasin, Muhammad Faizal A Ghani, Norfariza Mohd Radzi

Abstract


Ketua Panitia (KP) di sekolah rendah (SR) memainkan peranan penting sebagai penghubung antara kepimpinan sekolah dan para guru. Kecekapan KP dalam menyokong visi dan misi sekolah adalah penting. Namun, kajian tentang kepimpinan KP masih terhad. Kertas ini bertujuan untuk mengupas kepimpinan KP dengan merujuk kepada model kepimpinan KP yang dikemukakan oleh Harris et al. (2001). Tujuh elemen kepimpinan KP yang berkesan seperti yang digariskan oleh Harris et al. (2001) turut dibincangkan. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa elemen kepimpinan perlu diterapkan kepada KP bagi memastikan mereka memiliki kelayakan dan keupayaan untuk memimpin panitia masing-masing dengan cemerlang. Perancangan dan pengurusan kepimpinan pemimpin pertengahan (PP) di sekolah juga memerlukan elemen kepimpinan yang mantap. Kerjasama erat antara pelbagai organisasi seperti Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM), Institut Aminuddin Baki (IAB), Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia (IPGM) dan juga universiti adalah penting untuk memastikan keberkesanan kepimpinan KP. Kajian ini juga mendapati bahawa kepimpinan KP adalah efektif apabila elemen kepimpinan diterapkan dan diurus dengan teliti seterusnya dapat memberi impak positif kepada pencapaian pelajar dan prestasi sekolah secara keseluruhan.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Jalil Ali, Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah, & Isrihan Mohamed. (2019). Amalan pengupayaan autonomi guru dalam pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan abad ke-21. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 6(1), 49–58.

Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman, Lokman Mohd Tahir, Siti Nisrin Mohd Anis, & Mohd Fadzli Ali. (2020). Exploring challenges in practicing instructional leadership: Insights from senior secondary principals. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11 C), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082310

Abdul Said Ambotang, & Katriani Maijohn. (2014). Kajian persepsi guru terhadap agihan tugas dan kepuasan kerja. Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan, 5, 19–33.

Adawati Suhaili, Kamisah Osman, & Mohd Effendi @ Ewan Mohd Matore. (2020). Issues and Challenges of Subject Leadership Competency for Malaysian Head of Science Panels (HoSP). International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v9-i2/7296

Adawati Suhaili, Kamisah Osman, & Mohd Effendi Mohd Matore. (2021). Issues and Problems of Leadership Competencies among Head of Science Panels in Sarawak. XV: International Conference on Servant Leadership and Accountability, Proceeding ICSLA 2021, 144–148.

Ainsworth, S., Costa, M. da, Davies, C., & Hammersley-Fletcher, L. (2022). New perspectives on middle leadership in schools in England – Persistent tensions and emerging possibilities. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221086847

Bryant, D. A., & Walker, A. (2022). Principal-designed structures that enhance middle leaders’ professional learning. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221084154

Cosenza, M. N. (2015). Defining teacher leadership: Affirming the teacher leader model standards. Issues in Teacher Education, 24(2), 79–99.

De Nobile, J. (2018). The ‘state of the art’ of research into middle leadership in schools. Annual International Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education.

De Nobile, J. (2021). Researching Middle Leadership in Schools: The State of the Art. International Studies in Educational Administration, 49(2), 3–27.

Edwards-Groves, C., Grootenboer, P., Hardy, I., & Rönnerman, K. (2019). Driving change from ‘the middle’: middle leading for site based educational development. School Leadership and Management, 39(3–4), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1525700

Ekaterini, G. (2011). A qualitative approach to middle managers’ competences. Management Research Review, 34(5), 553–575.

Fusarelli, B. C., Fusarelli, L. D., & Riddick, F. (2018). Planning for the Future: Leadership Development and Succession Planning in Education. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13(3), 286–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775118771671

Ghamrawi, N. (2010). No teacher left behind: Subject leadership that promotes teacher leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 38(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209359713

Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., & Ghamrawi, N. A. R. (2023). Stepping into middle leadership: a hermeneutic phenomenological study. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2023.2248060

Gordon, Z. V. (2005). The effect of distributed leadership on student achievement. Central Connecticut State University. Tesis Doktor Falsafah (tidak diterbitkan).

Grootenboer, P. (2018). The practices of school middle leadership. Leading profesional learning. Springer Nature Singapore Ptd Ltd.

Grootenboer, P., Edwards-Groves, C., & Ronnerman, K. (2015). Leading practice development: Voices from the middle. Professional Development in Education, 41(3), 508–526.

Gunter, H. M. (2018). An intellectual history of school leadership practice and research. International Journal of Christianity & Education, 22(1), 81–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056997117743945

Gurr, D. (2018). School middle leaders in Australia, Chile and Singapore. School Leadership and Management, 39(3–4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1512485

Hamidah Yusof, Jamal @ Nordin Yunus, & Sharifah Hasima Syed Daud. (2016). Aplikasi analisis modifikasi kepentingan prestasi amalan penyeliaan pengajaran ketua panitia seperti sedia ada dan yang diperlukan oleh guru. Malaysia Journal of Society and Space, 12(8), 89–99.

Harris, A., Busher, H., & Wise, C. (2001). Effective Training for Subject Leaders. Journal of In-Service Education, 27(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580100200139

Javadi, V., Bush, T., & Ng, A. (2017). Middle leadership in international schools: Evidence from Malaysia. School Leadership and Management, 37(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1366439

Jemaah Nazir dan Jaminan Kualiti (JNJK). (2009). Laporan Tahunan Jemaah Nazir dan Jaminan Kualiti (JNJK) .

Kahila, S., Heikka, J., & Sajaniemi, N. (2020). Teacher leadership in the context of early childhood education: ConcepKahila, S., Heikka, J., & Sajaniemi, N. (2020). Teacher leadership in the context of early childhood education: Concepts, characteristics and enactment. Southeast Asia Early Childhood J. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 9(1), 28–43. http://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/SAECJ

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2022). Pembangunan pemimpin pertengahan (panduan untuk kursus kepimpinan pemimpin pertengahan) (Vol. 1). Institut Aminuddin Baki. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. http://iab.moe.edu.my

Kim Peng, T., Azyanzuhaila Hasan Basri, & Kalidass Machappan. (2024). Kepimpinan Pemimpin Pertengahan: Satu Tinjauan Berasaskan Kaedah Fuzzy Delphi Method. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 11(2), 52–62.

Majelan Sulong, Rusli Ahmad, & Nur Fatihah Abdullah Bandar. (2020). Sistem Pengurusan Prestasi dan Transformasi Penilaian Prestasi Untuk Pegawai Perkhidmatan Pendidikan : Suatu Tinjauan Menyeluruh. Jurnal Sultan Alauddin Sulaiman Shah, 7(2), 32–41.

Malloy, J., & Leithwood, K. (2017). Effects of distributed leadership on school academic press and student achievement. In How school leaders contribute to student success (pp. 69–91). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50980-8_5

Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah, & Shuhaida Shamsudin. (2017). Talent Management and Teacher Leadership Talent Development in High Performing School in Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Best Practices, 1(1), 19–35.

Muhammad Nasaruddin Al Hussaini Shaari. (2020). Gaya kepimpinan ketua panitia bidang agama terhadap pengurusan kerja di sekolah menengah agama negeri Terengganu. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Tesis Sarjana (tidak diterbitkan).

OECD Talis. (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environment: First Result from TALIS.

Peters-Hawkins, A. L., Reed, L. C., & Kingsberry, F. (2018). Dynamic Leadership Succession: Strengthening Urban Principal Succession Planning. Urban Education, 53(1), 26–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916682575

Rohana Ahmad, Ahmad Martadha Mohamed, & Halimah Abdul Manaf. (2018). The Relationship Between Transformational Leadership Characteristic and Succession Planning Program in the Malaysian Public Sector. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 7(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1/2017.7.1/1.1.19.30

Shafila Jumaat. (2008). Pengetahuan kepimpinan, kemahiran pengurusan dan sikap ketua panitia Sains di sekolah kebangsaan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana (tidak diterbitkan).

Sonia Blanford. (2011). Panduan pengurus peringkat pertengahan di sekolah. Institut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia.

Sukor Beram, Marinah Awang, & Ramlee Ismail. (2019). Analisis keperluan pembangunan model kompetensi pemimpin pertengahan. Educational Management and Leadership for Education 4.025, November 2020, 25–31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346425605_APCEMaL_Analisis_Keperluan_Model_Kompetensi_2019

Wise, C. (2001). The monitoring role of the academic middle manager in secondary schools. Educational Management & Administration, 29(3), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211x010293007

Zaliza Md Yasin, Muhammad Faizal A.Ghani, Norfariza Mohd Radzi, & Nurhanani Mohd Fadzil. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of Research on Head of Panel Leadership in Malaysian Primary Schools. Journal of Social Research and Behavioral Sciences, 10(22), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.52096/jsrbs.10.22.07

Zaliza Md Yasin, Muhammad Faizal A Ghani, & Norfariza Mohd Radzi. (2024). Leadership of the Head of Panels of Malaysian Primary Schools : A Need to Implement Leadership Elements. International Journal of Management and Social Researches, 11(21), 27–32.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This proceeding series is indexed by:

ipiii.pnggoogle.png

ISSN: 2987-2448