Tahap Tingkah Laku Inovatif Guru Gen ‘Y’ Sekolah Rendah di Kerian, Perak

Ramlan Alwi bin Mahmud, Ahmad Zabidi bin Abdul Razak, Kenny Cheah Soon Lee

Abstract


This study aims to examine the level of innovative behavior of Gen 'Y' teachers in a district within the state of Perak. This study is based on the Innovative Behavior Model by Janssen (2000). The study focuses on aspects of idea generation, promotion, and realization. The survey method, which uses a questionnaire as a measurement tool, was employed to collect data, involving a total of 310 teachers as study respondents. The findings show that the innovative behavior of Gen 'Y' teachers is at a moderate level. Gen 'Y' teachers should further enhance their innovative behavior to align with the development of 21st Century Education (PAK21). In conclusion, the findings of this study are new and provide guidance to stakeholders for improving the level of innovative behavior of Gen 'Y' teachers.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adnan, Z., & Husnin, H. (2024). Cabaran guru mengaplikasikan pembelajaran digital melalui pelantar digital educational learning initiative malaysia (delima) dalam pengajaran dan pemudahcaraan (pdpc):[the challenges of teachers in implementing digital learning through the digital learning initiative malaysia (delima) platform in teaching and facilitation]. International Journal of Contemporary Education, Religious Studies and Humanities, 4(1), 27-41.

Alper Ertürk (2012). Linking psychological empowerment to innovation capability: investigating the moderating effect of supervisory trust. International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 3 No. 14 [Special Issue – July 2012]

Anurupa Kundu & Debdulal Dutta Roy (2016). School climate perception and innovative work behaviour of school teachers, International Journal and Psychological Research (IJEPR). Volume 5, Issue 2, June 2016

Azra Ayue Abdul Rahman, Siti Aisyah Panatik dan Rose Alinda Alias (2014). The influence of psychological empowerment on innovative work behavior among academia in Malaysian research universities. DOI: 10.7763/IPEDR. 2014. V 78. 21, pg: 108 – 112

Babbie, E. (2004). The Practice of Social Research. Belmont CA, Wadsworth.

Behrstock, J., Druţu, C., & Mosher, L. (2009). Thick metric spaces, relative hyperbolicity, and quasi-isometric rigidity. Mathematische Annalen, 344, 543-595.

Cennamo, L. and Gardner, D. (2008), “Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organsation values fit”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 23 No. 8, pp. 891-906.

Chua, Y.P. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: asas statistik penyelidikan. Kuala

Lumpur: Mcgraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd.

Cummings, T. G. (2008). Handbook of organization development. Sage.

De Jong, J. & Den Hartog, D. 2010. Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management 19(1): 23–36.

Faisal @ Ahmad Faisal bin Abdul Hamid (2013). Guru pencetus kretiviti dan penjana

inovasi. Diambil daripada https://umexpert.um.edu.my/file/publication/00006434_106608.pdf

Fu, X., & Gong, Y. (2011). Indigenous and foreign innovation efforts and drivers of technological upgrading: evidence from China. World development, 39(7), 1213-1225.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (9th edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall

Galbraith, J. R. (1982). Designing the innovating organization. Organizational Dynamics, 10,5–25.

Granziera, H., & Perera, H. N. (2019). Relations among teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs, engagement, and work satisfaction: A social cognitive view. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 75-84.

Hasanali, F. (2002). Critical success factors of knowledge management.

Jeroen P.J. de Jong, Deanne N. Den Hartog, (2007) "How leaders influence employees'

innovative behaviour", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 10 Issue: 1, pp.41-64, doi: 10.1108/14601060710720546

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73: 287–302.

Kanter, R. (1983). The change masters. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Kanter, R. (1988). When a thousand owers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 169–211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Lai, Z. S. Z., & Rosli, A. N. (2021). Keberkesanan Penggunaan Video Pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu dalam Kalangan Murid Tahun 6 Semasa Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran di Rumah (PdPR): The Effectiveness of the Use of Malay Language Learning Videos Among Year 6 Students During Home-Based Learning. Journal of ICT in Education, 8(3), 76-99.

Lukes, M., & Stephan, U. (2017). Measuring employee innovation: A review of existing scales and the development of the innovative behavior and innovation support inventories across cultures. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research,23(1), 136-158.

Musa, M., & Jamil, H. (2023). hubungan kepimpinan distributif pemimpin terhadap tingkah laku inovatif guru di sekolah menengah, Pulau Pinang. JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 10(4), 29-40.

Messmann, G., Mulder, R.H., & Gruber, H. (2010). Relations between vocational teachers’characteristics of professionalism and their innovative work behavior. Emperical Research in Vocational Education and Training. 2(1), pp 21-40.

Mohd. Asri bin Ispal & Mohd Khata bin Jabor (2014). Pengaruh kompetensi keusahawanan terhadap tingkahlaku inovatif. 1 st International Education Postgraduate Seminar/ieps2014

Mohd Majid Konting. (2004). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Edisi Ke-5. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Oplatka, I. (2016). Teachers’ innovative behavior: Its characteristics and conditions. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(2), 138-157.

Pricewaterhouse Cooper. (2009). Malaysia Gen-Y unpluggerd. Diambil daripada Malaysia’s http://www.geniustribes.com/resources/gen-yMal.pdf

Salleh Abd. Rashid, Mohd. Yusof Abdullah, Raja Ismail Raja Lope Ahmad & Mohammed Sani Ibrahim (2007). Mentoran dan perkembangan kerjaya guru novis. Dalam Zamri Mahamod, Norasmah Othman & Mohammed Sani Ibrahim (Eds.), Profesionalisme guru novis (ms 103-123). Bangi: Fakulti Pendidikan, UKM.

Shapira-Lishchinsky and Sigalit Tsemach (2014). Psychological Empowerment as a Mediator Between Teachers’ Perceptions of Authentic Leadership and Their Withdrawal and Citizenship Behaviors. Educational Administration Quarterly 2014, Vol. 50(4) 675–712.

Siti Faizzatul Aqmal Binti Mohamad Mohsin & Razali Bin Hassan (2011). Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran berasaskan ‘Streaming Video’ bagi meningkatkan tahap kefahaman pelajar Abad ke-21. Persidangan Kebangsaan Penyelidikan dan Inovasi dalam Pendidikan dan Latihan Teknik dan Vokasional: Universiti Tun Hussein Onn

Spreitzer, G. M. (2021). Quinn, Robert E.: The paradoxical mind that inspires positive change. In the Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers (pp. 1417-1435). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2014). Toward a Model of Explaining Teachers’ Innovative Behavior a Literature Review. Review of Educational Research.

Tuomi, I. (2007). Learning in the age of networked intelligence. European Journal of

Education, 42(2), 235–254.

Utusan Malaysia (2023). Diambil daripada https://www.utusan.com.my/nasional/2023/09/kit-segitiga-awesome-johan-inovasi-guru-karnival-pendidikan-murid-orang-asli/


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This proceeding series is indexed by:

ipiii.pnggoogle.png

ISSN: 2987-2448