Quality Assurance System (SPMI) Management Based On E-SPMI KPIS at Widya Mandira Catholic University East Nusa Tenggara

Hironimus Tangi, Achmad Supriyanto

Abstract


In this article, we will review relevant literature related to SPMI management based on e-SPMI KPIs in universities, especially at Widya Mandira Catholic University. The focus of this article's study includes; a). How the implementation of e-SPMI KPIs compares to the concept of quality management in higher education, and b). Impact on institutions implementing quality assurance systems based on e-SPMI KPIs. The method of this research is to use a qualitative fan quantitative approach with a case study method. Data collection techniques through direct observation, document and archive searches, and in-depth interviews. The results of this study are The results of this study show that a). The SPMI document is determined at Unwira through the determination of key indicators based on government regulations, regulations of the PT/LAM accreditation body, based on the Vision and Strategic Plan. The Main Indicator as the key to SPMI is made in e-SPMI and developed by the Unwira IT Team. The trial of the use of e-SPMI KPIs was carried out for 3 years with achievements, namely in 2021 with a score of 2.79 out of a maximum score of 4 or 62%, in 2021 with a score of 2.5 out of a maximum score of 4 or 69.75%, and in 2023 with a score of 3.07 out of a maximum score of 4 or 76.75%. The e-SPMI KPIs model has advantages and disadvantages, so it needs continuous improvement to become a superior accredited university

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, Thamrin & Francis Tantri, 2012. Marketing Management, Jakarta: PT. King Grafindo Persada,

Adams, K. A. & Lawrence, E. K. (2018). Research Methods, Statistics, and Applications. New York: Sage Publications.

Altbach, P. G., & de Wit, H. (2015). Internationalisation and Global Tension: Lessons from History. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19, 4-10.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315314564734

Alzafari, K., & Ursin, J. (2019). Implementation of quality assurance standards in European higher education: does context matter?. Quality in Higher Education, 25, 58 - 75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2019.1578069.

Arifin, M., , Z., & , D. (2023). Development Of Heutagogy-Based Internal Quality Assurance System (Spmi) Implementation Assistance Model For Enhancement Of Quality Commitment Of Pts Leaders In North Sumatra. Journal of Namibian Studies : History Politics Culture. https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v34i.1190.

Dai, J., Tan, P., Xiao, L., Jia, L., He, Y., & Luo, J. (2023). A Fuzzy Adaptive Zeroing Neural Network Model With Event-Triggered Control for Time-Varying Matrix Inversion. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 31, 3974-3983. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2023.3272653.

Gaebel W, Becker T, Janssen B, Munk-Jorgensen P, Musalek M, Ro ̈ssler W, et al. 2012; 27(2):87–113 EPA guidance on the quality of mental health services. Eur Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.12.001

Mulyani, S., Nugroho, A., & Nurain, M. (2022). SIMANTUL: Model of Internal Quality Audit Management System in Higher Education. International Journal of Informatics and Computation. https://doi.org/10.35842/ijicom.v4i2.52.

Janjić, V., Todorović, M., & Jovanović, D. (2020). Key Success Factors and Benefits of Kaizen Implementation. Engineering Management Journal, 32, 106 - 98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2019.1664274.

Javed, Y., & Alenezi, M. (2023). A Case Study on Sustainable Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108136.

Keshta, I. (2019). A model for defining project lifecycle phases: Implementation of CMMI level 2 specific practice. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci., 34, 398-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.10.013.

Maciel-Monteon, M., Limón-Romero, J., Gastelum-Acosta, C., Baez-López, Y., Tlapa, D., & Borbón, M. (2020). Improvement project in higher education institutions: A BPEP-based model. PLoS ONE, 15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227353.

Smadi, S. (2009). Kaizen strategy and the drive for competitiveness: challenges and opportunities. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal Incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 19, 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/10595420910962070.

Sarrico, C. (2022). Quality management, performance measurement and indicators in higher education institutions: between burden, inspiration and innovation. Quality in Higher Education, 28, 11 - 28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2021.1951445.

Sari, B., Maunati, Y., Wuryandari, G., &, L. (2022). The Widening Global Network of Indonesian Diaspora Scholars in Malaysia. Diaspora Studies. https://doi.org/10.1163/09763457-20221004.

Rosser, A. (2022). Higher Education in Indonesia: The Political Economy of Institution-Level Governance. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 53, 53 - 78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2021.2010120.

Schindler, L., Puls-Elvidge, S., & Crawford, L. (2015). Definitions of quality in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5 (3). DOI:10.18870/hlrc.v5i3.244

Rof, A., Bikfalvi, A., & Marqués, P. (2020). Digital Transformation for Business Model Innovation in Higher Education: Overcoming the Tensions. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124980.

Tsinidou, M., Gerogianns, V., & Fitsilis, P. (2010). Evaluation of Factors That Determine Quality in Higher Education: An Empirical Study. Quality Assurance in Education, 18, 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881011058669

Tetteh, H. (2012). Kaizen: a process improvement model for the business of health care and perioperative nursing professionals.. AORN journal, 95 1, 104-8 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2011.11.001.

Zairi, M. (2012) Managing customer dissatisfaction through effective complaints management systems. The TQM magazine 12 (5), 331-337.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This proceeding series is indexed by:

ipiii.pnggoogle.png

ISSN: 2987-2448