Improving STEM Literacy on the Topic of Organic Solar Cells Through an AI-Powered Personalized Learning Platform: A Case Study of Pre-Physics Teachers
Abstract
In an era where Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education holds pivotal
importance, this research endeavors to explore innovative approaches to enhance STEM literacy,
with a specific focus on the topic of organic solar cells. This study presents a case study conducted
among pre-physics teacher students to improve their understanding of this critical topic by
integrating an AI-powered personalized learning platform. The research is grounded in the belief
that personalized learning, augmented by artificial intelligence, can offer tailored and engaging
educational experiences. By targeting pre-physics teacher students, this study not only addresses
the fundamental STEM knowledge gap but also aims to contribute to the development of proficient
educators who can effectively impart this knowledge to future generations. The study methodology
involves the implementation of an AI-powered personalized learning platform designed to adapt to
the individual learning needs and preferences of the participants. Data is collected from pre- and
post-intervention assessments, as well as feedback from the participants, to evaluate the platform's
effectiveness. Preliminary findings demonstrate significant improvements in STEM literacy related
to organic solar cells among the pre-physics teacher students. The AI-powered platform, by offering
customized content, feedback, and learning pathways, has been instrumental in elevating their
comprehension of this complex subject matter. This research not only contributes to the field of AIenhanced
education but also offers insights into the potential of personalized learning platforms in
improving STEM literacy. The findings have implications for curriculum development, teacher
training, and the broader quest for fostering STEM competence among the next generation of
educators. In conclusion, the study underscores the promise of AI-powered personalized learning
platforms in augmenting STEM education, explicitly enhancing the understanding of organic solar
cells among pre-physics teacher students.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amalu, E. H., Short, M., Chong, P. L., Hughes, D. J., Adebayo, D. S., Tchuenbou-Magaia, F., . . .
Oikonomou, T. I. (2023). Critical skills needs and challenges for STEM/STEAM
graduates increased employability and entrepreneurship in the solar energy sector.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 187, 113776.
Armin, A., Li, W., Sandberg, O. J., Xiao, Z., Ding, L., Nelson, J., . . . Wang, T. (2021). A history and
perspective of non-fullerene electron acceptors for organic solar cells. Advanced Energy
Materials, 11(15), 2003570.
Armstrong, R. C., Wolfram, C., De Jong, K. P., Gross, R., Lewis, N. S., Boardman, B., . . . Ramana, M.
(2016). The frontiers of energy. Nature Energy, 1(1), 1-8.
Ballard, J., & Butler, P. (2011). Personalised learning: Developing a Vygotskian framework for elearning.
International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 7(2), 21.
Board, O. S., National Academies of Sciences, E., & Medicine. (2019). Environmental engineering
for the 21st century: Addressing grand challenges: National Academies Press.
Bryan, L. A., Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C., & Roehrig, G. H. (2015). Integrated STEM education.
STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education, 23-37.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities.
Council, N. R. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in
science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: National Academies Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
methods approaches: Sage publications.
DeCoito, I., & Estaiteyeh, M. (2022). Transitioning to online teaching during the COVID-19
pandemic: An exploration of STEM teachers’ views, successes, and challenges. Journal
of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 340-356.
Dempere, J. M., Flores, P., & Allam, H. (2023). The Challenges Posed by National Arti icial
Intelligence Strategies and Policies on Higher Education Institutions. Paper presented at
the Proceedings of the HCT International General Education Conference (HCT-IGEC
.
Goodnough, K. (2010). Investigating pre-service science teachers’ developing professional
knowledge through the lens of differentiated instruction. Research in Science Education,
, 239-265.
Kempa, T. J. (2012). Nanowire Architectures for Next-Generation Solar Cells and Photonic Devices.
Harvard University.
Maghsudi, S., Lan, A., Xu, J., & van Der Schaar, M. (2021). Personalized education in the arti icial
intelligence era: what to expect next. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 38(3), 37-50.
Mayes, R., & Myers, J. (2015). Quantitative reasoning in the context of energy and environment:
Modeling problems in the real world: Springer.
McGrath, J. L., Taekman, J. M., Dev, P., Danforth, D. R., Mohan, D., Kman, N., . . . Lemheney, A.
(2018). Using virtual reality simulation environments to assess competence for
emergency medicine learners. Academic Emergency Medicine, 25(2), 186-195.
Nurahman, A., & Pribadi, P. (2022). Pemanfaatan kecerdasan buatan pada media pembelajaran
berbantuan google assistant: penelitian tindakan kelas pada materi Hukum Newton.
Jurnal Genesis Indonesia, 1(01), 24-32.
Nurahman, A., Widodo, W., Isha it, I., & Saulon, B. O. (2018). The development of worksheet
based on guided discovery learning method helped by phet simulations interactive
media in newton's laws of motion to improve learning outcomes and interest of
vocational education 10th grade students. Indonesian Review of Physics, 1(2), 37-41.
Shaked, H., Schechter, C., Ganon-Shilon, S., & Goldratt, M. (2017). Systems thinking for school
leaders: Springer.
Shemshack, A., & Spector, J. M. (2020). A systematic literature review of personalized learning
terms. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1-20.
Srinivasa, K., Kurni, M., & Saritha, K. (2022). Harnessing the Power of AI to Education Learning,
Teaching, and Assessment Methods for Contemporary Learners: Pedagogy for the Digital
Generation (pp. 311-342): Springer.
Tytler, R. (2020). STEM education for the twenty- irst century. Integrated approaches to STEM
education: An international perspective, 21-43.
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50
years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidi ies its importance. Journal of
educational Psychology, 101(4), 817.
Yannier, N., Hudson, S. E., & Koedinger, K. R. (2020). Active learning is about more than handson:
A mixed-reality AI system to support STEM education. International Journal of
Arti icial Intelligence in Education, 30, 74-96.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This proceeding series is indexed by:
