Vocational Program-Student Mismatch: Students’ Experiences of Choice, Learning, and Career Uncertainty

Novan Ardiansyah, M. Arif Hidayat, Ratna Ayu Dewitasari, Husni Hanafi, Roudhotul Husna Yanif

Abstract


Vocational program-student mismatch is an important issue in secondary vocational education because students may enter programs that do not correspond with their initial preferences, shaping their subsequent learning experiences and career considerations. This study explored students’ experiences of vocational choice, learning, and career development in the context of program–student mismatch. A qualitative case study design was employed. An initial questionnaire was administered to approximately 300 Grade 10 students, followed by interviews with students identified as experiencing mismatch, supplemented by observation and school documentation. Data were analyzed through qualitative data reduction, organization, and interpretation. The screening identified 65 students (21.67%) whose current vocational program was not their first choice. Students’ accounts indicated that mismatch was shaped by parental and peer influence, limited information about vocational programs and career pathways, and limited understanding of their vocational interests and abilities. Students also described reduced motivation, difficulties engaging with vocational learning, and challenges in understanding vocational subject matter. The findings suggest that program–student mismatch is shaped by social, informational, and developmental conditions and may extend into students’ learning and emerging career considerations. The study highlights the importance of proactive career guidance, comprehensive vocational information, and continued counseling support.

Full Text:

PDF

References


American School Counselor Association (ASCA). (2019). ASCA National Model: A Framework for School Counseling Programs (4th ed.). American School Counselor Association.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Gysbers, N. C., & Henderson, P. (2012). Developing and Managing Your School Guidance and Counseling Program (5th ed.). American Counseling Association.

Holland, J. L. (1997). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Prayitno, & Amti, E. (2004). Dasar-Dasar Bimbingan dan Konseling. Rineka Cipta.

Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications, and Theory. Houghton Mifflin.

Santrock, J. W. (2012). Adolescence (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16(3), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(80)90056-1

Winkel, W. S., & Hastuti, M. M. S. (2006). Bimbingan dan Konseling di Institusi Pendidikan. Media Abadi.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This proceeding series is indexed by:

ipiii.pnggoogle.png

ISSN: 2987-2448