Analysis of BISINDO Sign Language Implementation in Simple Sentences Based on 3D Animation

Keyne Berly Clorinda Hendel, Amalia Putri Hanum, Anna Firqatun Najiah, Meila Eka Prasetya, Nazwa Ardiani, Dimas Arif Dewantoro, Nurul Musyahadah

Abstract


The deaf are described as individuals with hearing impairments ranging from mild to severe who rely on visual-based communication. In Indonesia, Indonesian Sign Language (BISINDO) is widely used due to its natural development within the deaf community. This study aims to evaluate the development and implementation of 3D animation as a visual learning aid for simple BISINDO sentences, making learning more intuitive and accessible. Using the ADDIE instructional model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation), the research integrated 30 sign language words into 17 simple sentences featuring custom 3D characters. Descriptive qualitative analysis combined with Likert-scale questionnaires evaluated media validity and usability through feedback from material experts, media experts, and a field test with 6 deaf students from Universitas Negeri Malang. The validation results yielded an overall score of 86.25%, categorizing the 3D animation media as "Very Suitable" for educational use. The findings confirm that 3D animation effectively bridges communication gaps by presenting realistic motion and engaging visual content.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.

De Vaus, D. A. (2014). Surveys in social research. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2015). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Hidayati, N., & Franesya, A. (2024). Analisis pola komunikasi interaktif anak tunarungu. Jurnal Pendidikan Inklusi, 8(1), 45-52.

Jannah, M., Harijanto, A., & Yushardi, Y. (2019). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis animasi untuk meningkatkan pemahaman siswa. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 8(2), 112-119.

Makmara, T. (2009). Tuturan persuasif wiraniaga dalam berbahasa Indonesia: Kajian etnografi komunikasi (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia.

Marschark, M., & Spencer, P. E. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

McKenzie, H., Boughton, M., Hayes, L., & Forsyth, S. (2008). Explaining the complexities and value of nursing practice and knowledge. In I. Morley & M. Crouch (Eds.), Knowledge as value: Illumination through critical prisms (pp. 209-224). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rodopi.

Munarsih, E. (2010). Peran bahasa isyarat dalam perkembangan kognitif anak tuli. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 6(2), 78-85.

Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things (Revised ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.

Puslitbang Kemensos RI. (2018). Studi aksesibilitas komunikasi bagi penyandang disabilitas pendengaran. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementerian Sosial Republik Indonesia.

Putra, E. M., Handarini, D. M., & Muslihati, M. (2019). Keefektifan achievement motivation training untuk meningkatkan motivasi berprestasi siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling, 4(2), 62-68.

Rahmah, A. (2018). Perbandingan penggunaan SIBI dan BISINDO dalam pembelajaran interaktif. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan, 12(1), 34-41.

Scheinin, P. (2009). Using student assessment to improve teaching and educational policy. In M. O'Keefe, E. Webb, & K. Hoad (Eds.), Assessment and student learning: Collecting, interpreting and using data to inform teaching (pp. 12-14). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This proceeding series is indexed by:

ipiii.pnggoogle.png

ISSN: 2987-2448