The Implementation of Deep Learning in Elementary School Education: An Analysis of Students’ Responses and Learning Interest

Najin Fadila Foresta, Surayanah Surayanah

Abstract


The Deep Learning approach in education emphasizes mindful, meaningful, and joyful learning to encourage active student engagement and deep understanding. This study aims to describe the implementation of the Deep Learning approach in elementary school education and to analyze students’ responses and interest in learning regarding its application. The study employed a descriptive qualitative approach and was conducted at UPT SD Negeri Gaprang 01. Data were collected through observation, interviews with the principal, teachers, and students, as well as documentation. The data were analyzed through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of Deep Learning was carried out by integrating three main principles: mindful learning, meaningful learning, and joyful learning. In terms of mindful learning, students were guided to develop readiness, focus, and awareness regarding their learning process. In terms of meaningful learning, the material is linked to students’ experiences and daily lives through contextual questions, projects, experiments, and environmental observations. Meanwhile, joyful learning is realized through educational games, icebreakers, experiments, the use of media, and group activities. Student responses indicate a positive trend toward the implementation of this approach. Students find it easier to understand material linked to real-life experiences and show enthusiasm for hands-on activities, games, experiments, and collaborative projects. The implementation of these three principles has the potential to create a more active, relevant, and enjoyable learning experience, thereby fostering elementary school students’ interest in learning.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azizah, N., Mumpuniarti, Rudiyati, S., & Evans, D. (2023). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical competencies in supporting students with learning difficulties. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(2), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.26345

Evans, W., Gable, R. A., & Habib, A. (2021). Lessons from the Past and Challenges for the Future: Inclusive Education for Students with Unique Needs. Education Sciences, 11(281). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci11060281

Flood, M., & Banks, J. (2021). Universal Design for Learning: Is It Gaining Momentum in Irish Education? Education Sciences, 11(341). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci11070341

Hornby, G., & M.Kauffman, J. (2021). Special and Inclusive Education: Perspectives, Challenges and Prospects. Education Sciences, 11(362), 1–3. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070362

Kauffman, J. M. (2021). The Promises and Limitations of Educational Tiers for Special and Inclusive Education. Education Sciences, 11(323), 1–8. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070323

Ke, L., Friedrichsen, P., Rawson, R., & Sadler, T. D. (2022). Teacher learning through collaborative curriculum design in the midst of a pandemic: A cultural historical activity theory investigation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103957

Kivirand, T., Leijen, Ä., Lepp, L., & Tammemäe, T. (2021). Designing and Implementing an In-Service Training Course for School TeamsonInclusive Education: Reflections from Participants. Education Sciences, 11(166). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040166

Li, Y. L., & Huan. (2024). An evidence-based inclusive pedagogical approach in action and its insights for enhancing the professional competence of inclusive education teachers in China. International Journal of Chinese Education, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585X241242529

Mu, R., Siripala, W., & Junaidi, J. (2026). Examining pre-service teacher competence in inclusive education: A case study from Guizhou, China. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 13(5), 11–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2026.05.002

Nissim, M., & Shamma, F. (2025). Supporting Teacher Professionalism for Inclusive Education: Integrating Cognitive, Emotional, and Contextual Dimensions. Education Sciences, 15(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101317

Paramita, A. A. J., Ariani, K. B., Mahadewi, N. P. D., & Werang, B. R. (2025). Tantangan Implementasi Pembelajaran Mendalam sebagai Pendekatan dalam Kurikulum Merdeka. DIKSI Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Sosial, 6(4), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.53299/diksi.v6i4.3030

Rahmawati, Y., Mu’ti, A., Suyanto, S., & Herianingtyas, N. L. R. (2025). PEMBELAJARAN MENDALAM: TRANSFORMASI PEMBELAJARAN MENUJU PENDIDIKAN BERMUTU. Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.24832/jpkp.v18i1.1281

Rapisa, D. R., Hermanto, H., & Suparno, S. (2026). Teacher Competency in Practicing Inclusive Education: A Systematic Review. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 20(2), 57–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v19i3.9373

Rose, R., Narayan, J., Matam, S., & Sambram, P. R. (2021). A Comparison of Provision and Access to Inclusive Education for Children with Disabilities in a Metropolitan City and a Rural District in Telangana State, India. Education Sciences, 11(111). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci11030111

Runge, I., Lazarides, R., Rubach, C., Richter, D., & Scheiter, K. (2023). Teacher-reported instructional quality in the context of technology-enhanced teaching: The role of teachers’ digital competence-related beliefs in empowering learners. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104761

Rusconi, L., Squillaci, M., & Mainardi, M. (2026). Effects of a neuroscience-informed universal design for learning training on the development of inclusive teaching competencies: a quasi-experimental study. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.178207

Wang, X., Niu, J., Fang, B., Han, G., & He, J. (2025). Empowering teachers’ professional development with LLMs: An empirical study of developing teachers’ competency for instructional design in blended learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 165, 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105091

Wood, S., Stocker, K., Sharma, U., & Leif, E. (2025). A scoping review of the components of effective teacher in-service professional development in inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 30(8), 1879–1908. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2025.2554251

Woodcock, S., Gibbs, K., Hitches, E., & Regan, C. (2023). Investigating Teachers’ Beliefs in Inclusive Education and Their Levels of Teacher Self-Efficacy: Are Teachers Constrained in Their Capacity to Implement Inclusive Teaching Practices? Education Sciences, 13(280), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030280

Yada, A., Leskinen, M., Savolainen, H., & Schwab, S. (2022). Meta-analysis of the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward inclusive education. Elsevier, 109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103521


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This proceeding series is indexed by:

ipiii.pnggoogle.png

ISSN: 2987-2448