The Role of the School Environment in Supporting Extrinsic Motivation Among Fifth-Grade Elementary School Students

Dhiya Nasywa, Surayanah Surayanah, Muhammad Ardiansyah, Nabila El Shafira Aghnia Kusumaningrum, Najwa Salsabila Putri Purwagita

Abstract


Extrinsic motivation plays a crucial role in fostering student engagement during the learning process, particularly through various stimuli originating from the school environment. This study aims to describe the role of the school environment in supporting the extrinsic motivation of fifth-grade elementary school students. The study employs a qualitative approach using a descriptive research design. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation, involving fifth-grade students and teachers as sources of information. Data validity was verified through triangulation of sources and techniques. The data were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study indicate that the school environment plays a role in supporting students’ extrinsic motivation through five main aspects: reinforcement and appreciation provided by teachers; the application of interactive and varied teaching methods; positive interactions with peers; the enforcement of classroom rules and discipline; and a conducive physical school environment. These various external stimuli encourage students to be more active, focused, and engaged in learning activities. However, some students still rely heavily on guidance, assignments, and reinforcement from teachers, so the development of independent learning initiatives has not been uniform. The research findings indicate that a positive and supportive school environment plays a crucial role in fostering students’ extrinsic motivation and can also be directed to facilitate the gradual development of independent learning.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahrbeck, B., & Felder, M. (2020). Analysis of barriers to inclusive schools: Why special education is necessary and not evil. Education Sciences, 10(12), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120359

Azizah, N., et al. (2024). Elementary teachers' pedagogical competencies in supporting students with learning difficulties.

Chambers, D., & Forlin, C. (2021). An historical review from exclusion to inclusion in Western Australia across the past five decades. Education Sciences, 11(4), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040173

Evans, D., Gable, R. A., & Habib, A. (2021). Lessons from the past and challenges for the future: Inclusive education for students with unique needs. Education Sciences, 11(8), 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080423

Flood, M., & Banks, J. (2021). Universal design for learning: Is it gaining momentum in Irish education? Education Sciences, 11(12), 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120782

Hornby, G. (2021). Are inclusive education or special education programs more likely to result in inclusion post-school? Education Sciences, 11(9), 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090535

Kauffman, J. M. (2021). The promises and limitations of educational tiers for special and inclusive education. Education Sciences, 11(6), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060292

Kivirand, T., Leijen, Ä., & Talts, L. (2021). Designing and implementing an in-service training course for school teams on inclusive education. Education Sciences, 11(10), 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100646

Lopes, J., & Oliveira, C. (2021). Inclusive education in Portugal: Teachers' professional development, working conditions, and instructional efficacy. Education Sciences, 11(8), 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080405

Luo, Y., & Li, H. (2024). An evidence-based inclusive pedagogical approach in action and its insights for enhancing the professional competence of inclusive education teachers in China.

Mu, G. M., et al. (2026). Examining pre-service teacher competence in inclusive education: A case study from Guizhou, China.

Nissim, M., & Shamma, F. (2025). Supporting teacher professionalism for inclusive education: Integrating cognitive, emotional, and contextual dimensions.

Rapisa, D. R., Hermanto, & Suparno. (2026). Teacher competency in practicing inclusive education: A systematic review.

Rusconi, L., Squillaci, M., & Mainardi, M. (2026). Effects of a neuroscience-informed universal design for learning training on the development of inclusive teaching competencies.

Shi, Y., et al. (2025). Teacher professional development of digital pedagogy for inclusive education.

Wang, X., et al. (2025). Empowering teachers' professional development with LLMs: An empirical study of developing teachers' competency for instructional design in blended learning.

Wilcox, G., et al. (2021). Using evidence-based practice and data-based decision making in inclusive education. Education Sciences, 11, Article.

Wood, S., Stocker, K., Sharma, U., & Leif, E. (2026). A scoping review of the components of effective teacher in-service professional development in inclusive education.

Woodcock, S., et al. (2023). Investigating teachers' beliefs in inclusive education and their levels of teacher self-efficacy.

Yada, A., et al. (2022). Meta-analysis of the relationship between teachers' self-efficacy and attitudes toward inclusive education.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This proceeding series is indexed by:

ipiii.pnggoogle.png

ISSN: 2987-2448