Curriculum Management and Intercultural Learning Model of the PASCH Program in Achieving Student Wellbeing at State Senior Highschool

Septiani Cahyaning Putri, Sabrina Oktafiani, Sunarni Sunarni, Raden Bambang Sumarsono, Ahmad Nurabadi

Abstract


Programs that combine foreign-language instruction with intercultural exchange, such as the PASCH Program (Schulen: Partner der Zukunft), are commonly studied either as curriculum-management practice or as a source of student wellbeing, rarely as a single, interconnected system. This study aims to construct and describe an integrative model of curriculum management and intercultural learning that achieve student wellbeing within the PASCH Program at SMA Negeri 5 Malang. A qualitative case study design was employed with 17 purposively selected informants, comprising the headmaster, the vice-principal for curriculum, German language teachers, active students, alumni, and parents. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation, and were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, followed by a cross-thematic synthesis to map the relationships among findings. Trustworthiness was established through source and technique triangulation, member checking, and researcher reflexivity. The resulting model comprises three interlocking components-curriculum management (planning, organizing, implementing, controlling), school strategies for student wellbeing, and students' meaning-making through the PERMA dimensions-connected by a two-directional relationship in which structural and pedagogical support flows top-down while student experience and feedback flow bottom-up, with the five PERMA dimensions themselves forming a self-reinforcing cycle.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Assyakurrohim, D., Ikhram, D., Sirodj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2022). Metode studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Komputer, 3(01), 1–9.

Banks, J. A. (2015). Cultural diversity and education (Vol. 4). Routledge New York, NY.

Byram, M. (2020). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence: Revisited. Multilingual matters.

Daft, R. L. (t.t.). Management. 14th ed (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Dodge, R., Daly, A., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2, 222–235. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v2i3.4

Hossain, S., O’Neill, S., & Strnadová, I. (2023). What constitutes student well-being: A scoping review of students’ perspectives: What constitutes student well-being: A scoping review of students’ perspectives. Child indicators research, 16(2), 447–483.

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2012). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. McGraw-Hill Education. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=xbV2pwAACAAJ

Kern, M. L., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2021). The Palgrave handbook of positive education. Springer Nature.

Leask, B. (2015). Internationalizing the curriculum. Routledge.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.

Noble, T., & McGrath, H. (2015). The PROSPER school pathways for student wellbeing: Policy and practices. Springer.

OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Results (Volume III): Students’ Well-Being. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273856-en

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles and issues. Allyn and Bacon Boston.

Robbins, S. P., Coulter, M., Coulter, M. K., & Randel, A. (2020). Management. Pearson. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=RqpPzQEACAAJ

Seligman, M., & Flourish, P. (2011). A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, 2025(25), 119.

Ulfatin, N. (2015). Metode penelitian kualitatif di bidang pendidikan: Teori dan aplikasinya. Media Nusa Creative.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This proceeding series is indexed by:

ipiii.pnggoogle.png

ISSN: 2987-2448