ANALYSIS OF ONLINE LEARNING OUTCOME ASSESSMENT OF MATHEMATICS SUBJECTS

Nazzar Arobbi, Icca Morinzky Rahmana Dewi, Henry Praherdhiono, Yulias Prihatmoko, Ary Purmadi

Abstract


Assessment of learning outcomes is an activity to collect information related to student learning outcomes. Assessment of learning outcomes carried out to determine student’s mastery of knowledge, skills, and attitudes after learning. There are principles in the implementation of the assessment must be followed in order to obtain an assessment result that is close to the truth. The aim of this study is to describe the suitability of the assessment of learning outcomes carried out by mathematics teacher with the principles of assessment (valid, objective, fair, integrated, transparency, comprehensive & continuous, systematic, based on criteria, accountability), with the 2013 curriculum learning objectives (knowledge, attitudes, and skills), with material, with student abilities, and with assessment time allocation. This research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Interviews and document analysis are data collection techniques in this study. Based on interviews, teachers, principals, and students gave the same responses. The results of the research show that the principles of valid, objective, fair, integrated, open, comprehensive & irrational, systematic, criterion-based, and accountable have been properly implemented. The online assessment has been prepared and implemented in accordance with the objectives of both knowledge, attitudes and skills. However, teachers more often use knowledge competency assessment. The online assessment prepared by the teacher is also in accordance with the teaching materials, both the scope and depth of the material. The online assessments are carried out according to students' abilities. The time given by the teacher to students is sufficient to work on the questions and according to the needs of the assessment. Based on the analysis, it turns out that the method/technique of online assessment is the same as offline assessment.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustiningsih, R. (2015). Implementasi prinsip-prinsip penilaian dalam evaluasi pembelajaran di Tk Negeri 2 Yogyakarta. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/33531954.pdf

Alimuddin, A. (2014). Penilaian dalam kurikulum 2013. Prosiding, 1(1), 23–33.

Ambiyar, M. P., & Panyahuti, M. S. (2020). Asesmen Pembelajaran Berbasis Komputer dan Android. Prenada Media. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=0g7uDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Ambiyar,+%26+Panyahuti.+(2020).+Asesmen+Pembelajaran+Bebasis+Komputer+dan+Android.&ots=ped1OVV8jL&sig=f-q3w4tl6wOWmH2O65DZ46f6nGI

April, S. (2019). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Guru Dalam Menyusun Kisi-Kisi Soal Dengan Metode Pendampingan Pola øeOCF di SDN Yanti Jogoroto. JDMP (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen Pendidikan), 4(1), 17–24.

Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. https://www.academia.edu/download/44822784/34-Evaluasi-Pembelajaran.pdf

Asrul, A., Ananda, R., & Rosnita, R. (2015). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Citapustaka Media.

Bloom, B. S. (2010). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=DLbBDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Creswell,+J.+W.,+%26+Poth,+C.+N.+(2016).+Qualitative+inquiry+and+research+design:+Choosing+among+five+approaches.+Sage+publications.&ots=-is419DUUs&sig=1RlTBTqjC_ClCLKyMYBroIUL310

Dikdas, T. G. (2021). Modul belajar mandiri calon guru. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan.

Elis Ratna Wulan, E., & Rusdiana, A. (2015). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Pustaka Setia. https://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/2336/

Fitrianti, L. (2018). Prinsip kontinuitas dalam evaluasi proses pembelajaran. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 10(1), 89–102.

Irhamni, I. (2019). Prinsip-Prinsip Dan Pendekatan Dalam Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Intelektualita, 5(1). https://jurnal.arraniry.ac.id/index.php/intel/article/view/4361.html

Karmana, I. W. (2013). Pentingnya Asesmen Autentik dan Alternatif dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. Bioscientist: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 1(2), 169–177.

Kusainun, N. (2020). Analisis Standar Penilaian Pendidikan di Indonesia. JP (Jurnal Pendidikan) : Teori dan Praktik, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.26740/jp.v5n1.p%p

Lesmono, A. D., Wahyuni, S., & Yulianing, A. A. A. (2012). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT PRAKTIKUM PADA PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA DI SMA. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(1), 87–92.

Mustopa, A., Jasim, J., Basri, H., & Barlian, U. C. (2021). Analisis Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(1), 24–29.

Nugraha, R., Purnamasari, I., & Baedowi, S. (2017). Evaluasi Penerapan Standar Penilaian Kurikulum 2013 Pada Kelas 4 Sekolah Dasar di Kecamatan Jambu. Jurnal Sekolah (JS), 2(1), 94–101.

Nurjannah, A. (2019). Penilaian Sikap Berbasis Kurikulum 2013 Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Raudhah Proud To Be Professionals: Jurnal Tarbiyah Islamiyah, 4(1), 33–42.

Putri, H., Susiani, D., Wandani, N. S., & Putri, F. A. (2022). Instrumen penilaian hasil pembelajaran kognitif pada tes uraian dan tes objektif. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 4(2), 139–148.

Rosyidi, D. (2020). Teknik dan instrumen asesmen ranah kognitif. Tasyri’: Jurnal Tarbiyah-Syari’ah Islamiyah, 27(1), 1–13.

Setiawan, Y. (2020). Kaidah Penulisan soal. Diakses Pada, 29. https://www.academia.edu/download/39794580/Kaidah_Penulisan_Soal.pdf

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. https://digilib.unigres.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=43

Supriyadi, S., Masrukan, M., & Sholihin, N. (2022). PRAKTIK PENILAIAN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN ONLINE. Bookchapter Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Semarang, 1, 26–54.

Warsah, I., & Habibullah, H. (2022). Implementasi evaluasi hasil belajar pendidikan agama islam di madrasah. Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI), 5(1), 213–225.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This proceeding series is indexed by:

ipiii.pnggoogle.png

ISSN: 2987-2448