Leader Self Transformation to Manage Waldroop and Butler's Six Problem Behaviours Model in Private Universities

Hironimus Tangi, Any Diana Vitasari, Mustiningsih Mustiningsih, Ahmad Nurabadi

Abstract


The progress of an HEI is determined by the effectiveness of leadership. Waldroop and Butler identified six problematic behaviours that often hinder effective leadership, namely The Heroic Manager, The Meritocrat, The Bulldozer, The Pessimist, The Rebel, and The Home Run Hitter. This research examines strategies that leaders can implement to manage and overcome these six problematic behaviours. The research problems are. 1). How do the six problematic behaviours according to Waldroop and Butler affect leadership in private universities? 2). What strategies can be applied to manage and overcome the six problematic behaviours? The research method used is mixed methods. Based on the data and discussion, it can be concluded that every leader certainly experiences six behaviours according to Waldroop and Butler, in this study according to the research objectives, namely: 1). Six problematic behaviours according to Waldroop and Butler affect leadership in higher education. This is indicated by the average data score of the statement from the questionnaire which is 4.0 or the category agrees that the six behaviours occur in college leadership. 2). Strategies that can be applied to manage and overcome these six problematic behaviours in an agency are: 1). Delegating tasks and building strong teams to avoid heroic manager behaviour. 2). Improve emotional intelligence and interpersonal communication to overcome meritocrats and bulldozers. 3). Build a culture of positive thinking and innovative solutions to overcome pessimists and rebels. 4) Develop sustainable strategic planning to avoid home run hitters. Leaders must be able to transform themselves in managing and overcoming the six problematic behaviours identified by Waldroop and Butler. By implementing effective leadership strategies, universities can improve.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akhir, M. (2023). Management of Private Universities (Case Study at Tjut Njak Dhien University Medan). Journal on Education,05 (02), https://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/913%0Ahttps://jonedu.org/index.php/ joe/article/download/913/715 2689-2699.

Amai, S. (2017). Ideal Leadership Model at Fak Tarbiyah and Keguruan: Herson Anwar and Lian G. Otaya Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo A. Introduction Leadership is actually not a power but a mandate, even though every dreamer. 17(2), 415–438.

BI Solikin M.Juhro. (2020). Transformational Leadership (Vol. 25, Issue June). Bank Indonesia Institute.

Budiman. (2022). Leadership Style Of The Rector Of The Sultan Muhammad Shafiuddin Sambas Institute Of Islam. 9(2), 356 363. ©

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth Edit). Copyright 2018 by SAGE Publications, extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.p hp/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf Inc. chrome-

Dennis, R. S., & Bocarnea, M. (2005). Development of the servant leadership assessment instrument. Leadership & Organisation Development Journal,26 (8), 600-615. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510633692

Jondar, A. (2021). Implications of Servant Leadership in the Field of Education. Journal of Public Administration Research1(1), 1–17.

Maria Fitricia, G., & Ayuning Hidayah, A. (2024). Dimensions of Servant Leadership Theory in Leadership Based on Banyumas Cablaka Local Culture. 26(2), 1–12.

Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Burnout. Stress: Concepts, Cognition, Emotion, and Behaviour: Handbook of Stress, June, 351-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978- 0-12-800951-2.00044-3

Muhamad Taufiq, erna L. (2021). Transformational Leadership Module for Administrator Leadership Training (LAN RI). state administration agency. Review.

Nababan, L., Lee, J. K., Al Kafit, M. A., & Hidayatullah, M. F. F. (2024). Preferred Leadership Styles for Millennials Generation: a Literature EKOBIS: Journal of Management Science and Accounting,12 (1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.36596/ekobis.v12i1.1318

Naudi, N. (2019). Preparing Credible Strategic Level Leaders to Realise Advanced Indonesia. Journal of Lemhannas RI Studies | Issue 38 | June 2019,38 (II), 13-19.

Rahmawati, M., Putri Zainudin, & Netania. (2022). The Effect of Relationship Focused Ceo Leadership and Inclusive Leadership Styles with Symmetrical Internal Communication on Scouting Millennial Employees in Jakarta Office Areas.

Trisakti Economic Journal,2 (2), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v2i2.13991 Sahadi et al. (2020). Characteristics of Current and Future Idolised Leaders in Organisations. Management Forum,6 (3), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.61938/fm.v15i2.164 Skills, Leadership, T. F. (2015). Leadership models. The Journal of Behavioural Economics,10 (1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-5720(81)80008-3

Sugiyono. (2015). Research Methods. Tobari. (2015). Private Universities' Strategies to Face Competition. Journal of Media Wahana Ekonomika, 12, 61–68.

Yanuarsari, R., Romansyah, R., Latifah, E. D., Wahidin, D., & Muchtar, H. S. (2022). Portrait of Leadership and Education Quality in the MBKM Era Descriptive Study at Private Universities. Educative: Journal of Education Science,4 (3), 3822-3831. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2757

Waldroop, J., & Butler, T. (2000). Managing away bad habits. Harvard business review, 78 5, 89-98, 199. Waldroop, J., & Butler, T. (1999). The Six Problem Behaviours in Management. Harvard Business Review.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This proceeding series is indexed by:

ipiii.pnggoogle.png

ISSN: 2987-2448