Preliminary Study Research Gaps in Visual Art Education (Teaching and Learning Perspectives)

Adiba Amanina Shaharuddin, Mumtaz Mokhtar, Nursyazlin Mohd Saleh

Abstract


Over the past few years, there has been an increase in literature about teaching and learning. The scope of visual art education studies is too large, and some of its related components are under-researched. This study examines the research gap in visual art education based on teaching and learning perspectives. Following on, this study highlighted the meaning of preliminary study as well as the terminology of seven research gaps, 1) theoretical gap, 2) knowledge gap, 3) practical-knowledge gap, 4) evidence gap, 5) methodological gaps, 6) empirical gap, and 7) population gap. This paper reviewed three articles, Article 1: An interactive approach to learning and teaching in visual arts education by Tomljenovic in 2015, Article 2: Project based learning pedagogical design in STEAM art education by Ahmad Dasuki Mohd Hawari & Azlin Iryani Mohd Noor in 2020 and Article 3: Mental models of prospective visual arts teachers toward visual arts education by Hicyilmaz in 2021 by using comparative analysis. The analysis and discussion of preliminary studies of the three articles involved 1) A compendium, 2) Similarities and Differences based on Teaching and Learning Perspectives including teaching approaches, teaching methods, teaching modes, teaching strategies, learning theories, learning environment, and classroom environment, and 3) Research Gaps revealed by the types. The results of the three articles being reviewed can be beneficial to individuals, researchers, art educators, academicians, stakeholders, institutions, ministries, expertise, and many more to establish and generate relevant research, and extended research regarding visual art education that is specifically into teaching and learning perspectives.

Full Text:

PDF

References


S. Jain, “Role of Preliminary Research in the Research Process,” Pragyaan: Journal of Mass Communications, Institute of Management Studies., vol. 9, issue. 1, pp. 55, Jun 2011. [Online]. Available: http://surl.li/iijle

J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, 4th ed., London, UK: Sage, 2018.

A. M. Willgens, R. Cooper, D. Jadotte, B. Lilyea, C. L. Langtiw and A. Obenchain-Leeson, “How to enhance qualitative research appraisal: Development of the methodological congruence instrument,” The Qualitative Report, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 2380-2395, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2361&context=tqr

E. Al-Saraf and E. Rautenbach, “How To Find A Research Gap (Literature Gap),” Grad Coach. https://gradcoach.com/research-gap/ (accessed May. 2, 2023)

R. Jain and P. Chetty, “How to identify research gaps and include them in your thesis?,” Knowledge Tank. https://www.projectguru.in/how-to-identify-research-gaps-and-include-them-in-your-thesis/ (accessed May. 2, 2023)

C. Müller-Bloch and J. Kranz, “A Framework for Rigorously Identifying Research Gaps in Qualitative Literature Reviews,” The Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301367526.pdf

D. A. Miles, “A taxonomy of research gaps: identifying and defining the seven research gaps,” Doctoral Student Workshop: Finding Research Gaps-Research Methods and Strategies, Dallas, Texas, pp. 1-15, 2017.

Z. Tomljenovic, “An Interactive Approach to Learning and Teaching in Visual Arts Education,” CEPS Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 73-93, 2015. doi: 10.25656/01:11406

Ahmad Dasuki Mohd Hawari & Azlin Iryani Mohd Noor. “Project based learning pedagogical design in STEAM art education,” Asian Journal of University Education, vol 16 issue 3, pp. 102-111, 2020. Available: myjms.mohe.gov.my

Y. Hicyilmaz, “Mental Models of Prospective Visual Arts Teachers toward Visual Arts Education,” International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, 2021. Available: DOI: https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2021.01.010

L. B. Nilson, Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.

Nor Rafizah Md Zain. “USM News Portal - From STEM, STEAM, STREAM To STREAMED.” News.usm.my. https://news.usm.my/index.php/english-news/6077-from-stem-steam-stream-to-streamed (accessed May. 10, 2023).

L. Muganga and P. Ssenkusu, “Teacher-Centered Vs. Student-Centered: An Examination of Student Teachers’ Perceptions about Pedagogical Practices at Uganda’s Makerere University,” Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry, 2019, vol. 11, no. 2, pp 16–40, 2019.

L. B. Nilson and , L. A. Goodson, Online Teaching at its best : Merging Instructional Design with Teaching and Learning Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, John Wiley & Sons, 2021.

V. H. Shinas, C. N. Ly, and S. Y. Ozden, Cases on Practical Applications for Remote, Hybrid, and Hyflex Teaching. IGI Global, 2022.

C.A. Chitiba, “Lifelong Learning Challenges and Opportunities For Traditional Universities,” Procedia-social and behavioral sciences 46, pp. 1943-1947, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.408

Z. B. Rodrigues, “Education: A study based on the UNESCO report on the four pillars of knowledge,” Revista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do Conhecimento, ed. 01,vol. 04, pp. 53-60, Jan 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.32749/nucleodoconhecimento.com.br/education/four-pillars.

M. H. Gandhi and P. Mukherji, “Learning Theories,” PubMed, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562189/. Accessed: May. 20, 2023.

B. Fairbanks, “5 Educational Learning Theories and How to Apply Them,” University of Phoenix. https://www.phoenix.edu/blog/educational-learning-theories.html (accessed May. 20, 2023).

L. Closs, M. Mahat and W. Imms, “Learning Environments’ Influence on Students’ Learning Experience in an Australian Faculty of Business and Economics,” Learning Environments Research, vol. 25, p. 271-285, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09361-2

Ministry of Education (MOE) Malaysia. Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education). Malaysia: Ministry of Education Malaysia, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.um.edu.my/docs/um-magazine/4-executive-summary-pppm-2015-2025.pdf. Accessed: May. 21, 2023.

Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) Malaysia, Blueprint on Enculturation of Lifelong Learning for Malaysia 2011 – 2020. Malaysia: Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. 2011. [Online]. Available: https://uil.unesco.org/document/malaysia-blueprint-enculturation-lifelong-learning-malaysia-2020-issued-2011

A. A. Shaharuddin, M. Mokhtar, B. Isa and Y. Dafri. "Lifelong Learning (LLL): Terminology in Art & LLL Blueprint in Malaysian Context." European Alliance for Innovation, p. 164-183. 2022, doi: 10.4108/eai.24-8-2021.2315248

R. Yorozu, Lifelong Learning in Transformation: Promising Practices in Southeast Asia: Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste and Vietnam. Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://uil.unesco.org/lifelong-learning/policies-database/lifelong-learning-transformation-promising-practices-southeast. Accessed: April. 14, 2023.

F. E. Olalere, “Integrating Theory and Practice: A critical Pedagogy in Art Education,” The International Journal of Humanities Education, vol. 16, issue. 3, 2018, doi: http://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0063/CGP/v16i03/1-8

Twelfth Malaysia Plan 2021-2025. Twelfth Malaysia Plan, 2021-2025. Malaysia: PNMB, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://rmke12.epu.gov.my/en/documents/twelfth-plan. Accessed: May. 21, 2023.

Ministry of Economic Affairs. Shared Prosperity Vision 2030, Restructuring Malaysia’s Development Priorities. Malaysia: Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.epu.gov.my/sites/default/files/2020-02/Shared%20Prosperity%20Vision%202030.pdf. Accessed: May. 21, 2023.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Flag Counter

INDEXED LINK