Pengembangan Taksonomi Penilaian Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) untuk Mempersiapkan Pendidik di Era Industri

Cari Winarti, Widha Sunarno, Edi Istiyono

Abstract


Taksonomi merupakan struktur hirarki yang mengidentifikasi kemampuan berpikir mulai dari jenjang terendah sampai ke jenjang tertinggi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah (1) mengembangkan taksonomi penilaian berbasis HOTS untuk pembelajaran fisika dan (2) mengetahui efektivitas taksonomi penilaian berbasis HOTS. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan (research and revelopment) yang merujuk pada model Borg & Gall. Tahap pengembangan terdiri dari 10 langkah. Adapun taksonomi penilaian divalidasi oleh berbagai ahli dan diujicobakan pada 15 guru fisika dari 7 sekolah. Teknik pengumpulan data yakni dengan teknik non tes, dengan instrumen lembar angket, pedoman wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Penelitian yang dilakukan ini telah berhasil mengembangkan taksonomi penilaian berbasis HOTS untuk mata pelajaran fisika yang terdiri dari empat proses kognitif  yakni analize, evaluate, infrence, dan create. Pengembangan taksonomi ini merangkai empat level kemampuan yang digunakan dalam fisika. Selain itu taksonomi penilaian berbasis HOTS ini efektif meningkatkan kemampuan guru dalam membuat soal fisika.

Full Text:

PDF

References


J. W. Santrock, Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.

L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman, 2001.

P. Holmes, “Teaching, learning and assessment: Complementary or conflicting categories for school statistics,” in Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. Teach. Statistics, 2002.

C. Winarti, W. Sunarno, and E. Istiyono, “Analysis of higher order thinking skills content of physics examinations in madrasah aliyah,” in Int. Conf. Math., Sci., Educ., 2015, pp. 65–69.

N. L. Webb, “Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states,” Research Monograph No. 18, 1999.

M. Clarke et al., Perceived Effects of State-Mandated Testing Programs on Teaching and Learning: Findings from Interviews with Educators in Low-, Medium-, and High-Stakes States. Boston: Lynch School of Education, 2003.

S. Lane, “Validity of high-stakes assessment: Are students engaged in complex thinking?,” Educ. Measur. J.: Issues and Pract., vol 23, no. 3, pp. 6–14, 2004.

G. V. D. Berg, “The use of assessment in the development of higher-order thinking skills,” Africa Educ. Rev., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 279–294, 2004.

E. Istiyono, D. Mardapi, and S. Suparno, “Pengembangan tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi fisika (pysthots) peserta didik SMA,” J. Peneliti. Eval. Pendidik., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2014.

W. R. Borg and M. D. Gall, Educational Reseach: An Introductional. New York: Longman, 1989.

H. Ismail, U. Kalthom, A. Manaf, and R. R. Said, “Teachers’ levels of knowledge and interest on higher order thinking skills (HOTS) according to the field taught and category of schools,” J. Modern Educ. Rev., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 611–621, 2016.

N. Harrison, “Using the interactive whiteboard to scaffold a metalanguage: Teaching higher order thinking skills in preservice teacher education,” Australian J. Educ. Technol., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 54–65, 2013.

J. Swaak, T. De Jong, and W. R. Van-Joolingen, “The effects of discovery learning and expository instruction on the acquisition of definitional and intuitive knowledge,” J. Comp. Assist. Learn., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 225–234, 2004.

J. Leach and P. Scott, “Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning,” Studies in Sci. Educ., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 115–142, 2002.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publikasi Oleh:

Jurusan Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Malang
Jl. Semarang 5 Gedung B22, Lowokwaru, Malang, 65145

Website: www.fisika.fmipa.um.ac.id
Email: [email protected]