Hubungan antara Penguasaan Konsep dengan Kemampuan Membuat Penjelasan Ilmiah Siswa pada Topik Fluida Statis

Maria Chandra Sutarja, Sutopo Sutopo, Eny Latifah

Abstract


Penelitian dilakukan dengan tujuan mengetahui hubungan antara penguasaan konsep dengan kemampuan siswa membuat penjelasan ilmiah pada topik fluida statis. Penelitian yang dilakukan dengan metode kuantitatif korelasional pada 55 siswa SMA kelas XI salah satu sekolah negeri di Kabupaten Lamongan ini menggunakan instrumen penguasaan konsep dan kemampuan membuat penjelasan ilmiah, yang memiliki nilai reliabilitas secara berturut-turut sebesar 0,814 dan 0,815. Diperoleh nilai r = (53) = 0,845, p = 0,000 dengan kesimpulan terdapat korelasi antara kedua variabel tersebut. Berdasarkan analisis regresi linier, penguasaan konsep siswa memiliki kontribusi sebesar 70% dalam kemampuan siswa membuat penjelasan ilmiah.

Kata Kunci: penguasaan konsep, penjelasan ilmiah, fluida statis.

Full Text:

PDF

References


K. L. McNeill, dan J. Krajcik (2008), Inquiry and scientific explanations: Helping students use evidence and reasoning. Science as inquiry in the secondary setting, 121-134.

Sutopo dan B. Waldrip (2014), Impact of a representational approach on students'reasoning and conceptual understanding in learning mechanics. International Journal of Science dan Mathematics Education, 12(4).

E. Etkina,, A. Warren, dan M. Gentile (2006), The role of models in physics instruction. The physics teacher, 44(1), 34-39.

National Research Council (2012), A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington D.C: National Academy Press.

K. L. McNeill, D. J. Lizotte, J. Krajcik, dan R. W. Marx (2006), Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191.

M. Goszewski, A. Moyer, Z. Bazan, dan D. J. Wagner (2013), January. Exploring student difficulties with pressure in a fluid. In P. V. Engelhardt, A. D. Churukian, dan N. S. Rebello (Eds.), AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1513, No. 1, pp. 154-157). AIP.

M. E. Loverude, P. R. L. Heron, dan C. H. Kautz (2010), Identifying and addressing student difficulties with hydrostatic pressure. American Journal of Physics, 78(1), 75-85.

U. Besson (2004), Students' conceptions of fluids. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1683-1714.

E. E. Glough dan R. Driver (1985), What do children understand about pressure in fluids?. Research in Science dan Technological Education, 3(2), 133-144.

M. C. Sutarja, Sutopo, dan E. Latifah (2016), Identifikasi Kesulitan pemahaman konsep siswa pada fluida statis. Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA 2016

S. Gang (1995), Removing preconceptions with a ‘‘learning cycle’’. The Physics Teacher, 33(6), 346-354.

M. E. Loverude, C. H. Kautz, dan P. R. Heron (2003), Helping students develop an understanding of Archimedes’ principle. I. Research on student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 71(11), 1178-1187.

K. L. McNeill dan J. Krajcik (2008), Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers' instructional practices on student learning. Journal of research in science teaching, 45(1), 53-78.

T. D. Sadler dan S. R. Fowler (2006), A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science Education, 90(6), 986-1004.

D. Hammer (2000), Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1), S52-S59.

C. Von Aufschnaiter, S. Erduran, J. Osborne, dan S. Simon (2008), Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of research in science teaching, 45(1), 101-131.

A. Zohar dan F. Nemet (2002), Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of research in science teaching, 39(1), 35-62.

T. D. Sadler dan D. L. Zeidler (2005), The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71-93.

J. Lewis dan J. Leach (2006), Discussion of socio‐scientific issues: The role of science knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1267-1287.

G. A. Morgan, N. L. Leech, G. W. Gloeckner, dan K. C. Barrett, 2004. SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation. Edisi Kedua. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Publikasi Oleh:

Jurusan Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Malang
Jl. Semarang 5 Gedung B22, Lowokwaru, Malang, 65145

Website: www.fisika.fmipa.um.ac.id
Email: [email protected]