SURVE KEPUASAN BLENDED LEARNING KEPADA MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN OLAHRAGA OFFERING A UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MALANG

Vicky Alfian Nugroho, Wasis D. Dwiyogo

Abstract


Salah satu bentuk pembelajaran yang mampu mengembangkan kemandirian belajar mahasiswa adalah blended learning, pembelajaran ini memadukan pembelajaran secara daring dan juga tatap muka. Bentuk pembelajaran ini memungkinkan mahasiswa dapat belajar secara efektif dan efesien, lebih mudah mengakses materi ajar, dan pada akhirnya meningkatkan kemandirian belajar mahasiswa karena belajar dilakukan secara mandiri. Dunia berubah dengan cepat. Universitas di seluruh dunia sekarang menerapkan dan berinvestasi dalam Lingkungan Pembelajaran Virtual yang membuka jalan untuk memberikan Bleanded Learning, sistem manajemen pembelajaran digunakan dalam konteks pendidikan tinggi.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aslanian C. B., Clinefelter D. L. 2012. Online college students Comprehensive data on demands and preferences. Louisville, KY: The Learning House.

Castle S. R., McGuire C. 2010. An analysis of student self-assessment of online, blended, and face-toface learning environments: Implications for sustainable education delivery. International

Education Studies.

Garrison R., Kanuka H. 2004. Blended learning: Uncovering it transformative potential in higher

education. The Internet and Higher Education.

Horn M. B., Staker H., Hernandez A., Hassel B., Ableidinger J. 2011. The rise of K–12 blended learning.

Innosight Institute.

Johnson L., Adams Becker S., Estrada V., Freeman A. 2014. NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher

Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

Kobchai S, Paitoon P, Somkiat T. 2020. Department of Industrial Educational and Technology, Faculty of Industrial Educational and Technology, King Mongkut Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.

Kyei-Blankson L., Ntuli E. Eds. 2014. Practical Applications in Blended Learning Environments: Experiences in K-20 Education. USA.

Means B. Toyama Y., Murphy R., Bakia M., Jones K. 2009. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in

Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.

Means B., Toyama Y., Murphy R., Bakia M., Jones K. 2010. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in

online learning. A meta analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, D.C.

Naaj M. A., Nachouki M., Ankit A. 2012. Evaluating Student Satisfaction with Blended Learning in a

Gender-Segregated Environment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research.

Owston R. D., Garrison D. R., Cook K. 2006. Blended e-learning at Canadian universities: issues &

practices. In: Bonk C. J., Graham C. R. (Eds.) Handbook of Blended Learning: global Perspectives, & Local Designs, Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco.

Pavlis-Korres M. Key. 2014. Factors for maximizing the effectiveness of blended e-learning: The outcome of the internal evaluation of a distance education program for adult learning in Greece. In: KyeiBlankson L., Ntuli E. (Eds.) Practical Applications in Blended Learning Environments: Experiences in K-20 Education.

Rienties B., Li N., Marsh V. 2015. Modeling and managing student satisfaction: Use of student feedback

to enhance learning experience. Quality Assurance Agency, Gloucester.

Svanum S, Aigner C. 2011. The influences of course effort, mastery and performance goals, grade

expectancies, and earned course grades on student ratings of course satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology

Vaughan N. 2014. Student engagement and blended learning: Making the assessment connection.

Education Sciences.

Wu J. H., Tennyson R. D., Hsia T. L. 2010. A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system

environment. Computers and Education.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.