OPTIMIZATION OF THE APPLICATION OF THE 2013 CURRICULUM
Abstract
Abstract: The implementation of the 2013 program is a strategic effort to improve the quality of education. The purpose of this research is to examine the problems and the steps taken to overcome them. This research method using literature study method. The results of this study are that there are three factors or inhibiting factors in the implementation of the 2013 program, namely: teacher readiness, academic support and teacher support, and strategic steps to overcome and overcome. These problems are teacher training, teacher socialization and student tutor coordination. both between governments.
Keywords: curriculum 2013, problems, strategic steps
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abong, R. (2015). Konstelasi Kurikulum Pendidikan di Indonesia. At-Turats, Vol. 9 Nomor 2: 37-47.
Bergqvist, E. & Bergvist, T. (2017) The role of the formal written curriculum in standards-based re-form. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(2): 149-168. doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.12023 23.
Chou, P.I. dan Ting, H.J. (2016). How closely related are the national curriculum and the global dimension? A content analysis of the global dimension in elementary school text-books in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(3): 533–543. doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9437-6.
Dikbud. (2013). Nomor 5, Tahun IV, September 2013.
Dina, A., Mawarsari, V.D., dan Suprapto, R. (2015). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 pada Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Discovery Learning Pendekatan Scientific terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Materi Geometri SMK. JKPM, 2(1): 22-31.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2010). Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Profesi Guru Buku 1: Pedoman Pengelolaan Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan (PKB). Jakarta: Kemdiknas, Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Mastur. (2017). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran di SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(1): 50-64.
Melati, E.R., dan Utanto, Y. (2016). Kendala Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Memahami Kurikulum 2013. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 4(1): 1-9.
Ormond, B.M. (2017). Curriculum decisions–the challenges of teacher autonomy over knowledge selection for history. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(5): 599-619. doi.org/10.1080/00220 272.2016.1149225.
Priestley, M. (2011). Whatever happened to curriculum theory? Critical realism and curriculum change. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19(2): 221–237.
Ruja, I.N. dan Sukamto. (2015). Survey Permasalahan Implementasi Kurikulum Nasional 2013 Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Sekolah Menengah Pertama di Jawa Timur. Sejarah dan Budaya, Tahun Kesembilan, 2(2): 193-199.
Samsudi. (2009). Desain Penelitian Pendidikan. Semarang: Unnes Press.
Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2): 166-178.
Siambaton, H.R., Erlinawati, dan Haryanto. (2016). Problem Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pendidikan Sosial di Jenjang Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 4(1): 10-16.
Subekti, A., Yudha, S.S., dan Budisantoso, H.T. (2016). Pemahaman dan Peran Guru TIK dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 4(1): 25-31.
Suherman, A. (20104). Implementasi Kurikulum Baru Tahun 2013 Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani: Studi Deskriptif Kualitatif Pada SDN Cilengkrang. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 1(1): 71-76.
World Bank. (2007). Investing in Indonesia’s Education: Allocation, Equity, and Efficiency of Public Expenditures. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4329. Diakses dari http://hdl. handle.net/10986/7280.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2003). UndangUndang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta.
Yusuf, M. (2013). Mengantisipasi Perubahan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Ilmiah SPIRIT, 13(1): 27-42.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.