Multicriteria Analysis for Determining the Priority Scale of Village Road Construction Based on Aspiration Funds in the National Priority Rural Area (KPPN) of Praya using ANP-TOPSIS Method

Henry Kadapi, Hariyadi Hariyadi, Made Mahendra

Abstract


This study aims to determine the priority scale for rural road development based on the Aspiration Fund of the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) in the National Priority Rural Area (KPPN) of Praya, Central Lombok Regency. Amidst limited regional fiscal resources, the allocation mechanism of Pokir requires a systematic approach to ensure more targeted and sustainable development. A multi-criteria decision-making method was employed by integrating the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Five main criteria were analyzed—technical, cost, social, economic, and accessibility—further detailed into ten sub-criteria. The ANP results indicated that accessibility holds the highest weight (0.5222), followed by social (0.2667), technical (0.1074), economic (0.0637), and cost (0.0399). At the sub-criteria level, access to public facilities, remote areas, and the number of poor residents were the most influential. TOPSIS analysis produced a ranking of seven rural road segments, with Mekar Sari–Selong Belanak ranked as the highest priority (0.8913), followed by Mekar Sari–Banyu Urip–Kateng (0.8649), Tumpak–Prabu (0.6646), Bolor Gejek–Kelambi–Bonder (0.5330), Kateng–Banyu Urip–Tumpak (0.3646), Banyu Urip–Mangkung (0.2084), and Selangit–Mapasan–Bts. Lobar (0.0397). These findings provide policy insights for managing Pokir funds in accordance with local needs, participatory planning, and spatial equity.

Full Text:

PDF

References


J. T. Okpa, “Exploring the relationship between infrastructural development and socioeconomic well-being in rural areas: Evidence from Bakassi, Cross River State, Nigeria,” J. Socioecon. Dev., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 153, 2022, doi: 10.31328/jsed.v5i2.3618.

M. of P. W. and P. Housing, “Master Plan, Development Plan, Feasibility Study, and Preliminary Design for the New Growth Center of KPPN Praya,” 2018.

E. D. S. Mochamad Thoriq Akbar, “The Impact of Village Fund Program in Developing Physical Infrastructure: Case on Construction Value Across Provinces in Indonesia,” vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 194–200, 2019.

N. Irawati, A. Afrisawati, I. Irianto, and P. A. N. Dalimunthe, “Combination of AHP and Topsis Methods in Determining the Priority of Road Construction Projects in Batu Bara Regency,” J. Sci. Soc. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 111, 2022, doi: 10.54314/jssr.v5i1.833.

Ö. Uygun, E. K. Tekez, H. Kcamak, and F. Şimşir, “An Integrated Approach Using Dematel, Anp and Topsis for Evaluating Research & Development Projects,” Period. Eng. Nat. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2014, doi: 10.21533/pen.v2i1.39.

J.- Hutagalung, “Application of the AHP-TOPSIS Method to Determine the Feasibility of Fund Loans,” J. Pekommas, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.56873/jpkm.v6i1.3023.

B. Hargi, M. Foralisa, and B. Susanti, “Prioritization of road management in district Ogan Komering Ulu Selatan based on analytical hierarchy process method,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 237–241, 2018.

P. Liu, “A Novel Method for Multiple Attribute Decision-Making of Continuous Random Variable Under Risk with Attribute Weight,” vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 702–711, 2011.

W. C. Yang, C. M. Choe, J. S. Kim, M. S. Om, and U. H. Kim, “Materials selection method using improved TOPSIS without rank reversal based on linear max-min normalization with absolute maximum and minimum values,” Mater. Res. Express, vol. 9, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ac2d6b.

T. L. Saaty, “Fundamentals of the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” pp. 15–35, 2001, doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_2.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.