CHAT-GPT IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES IN LEARNING AT THE HIGHER EDUCATION LEVEL

Rosyi Damayani T Maningtyas, Novita Kusumadewi Kusumadewi

Abstract


Higher education has undergone significant transformations in recent years, especially in terms of the integration of technology into the learning process. One technology that is emerging as a potential effective learning tool is Chat GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer). This study aims to analyze GPT Chat implementation strategies in the context of higher education. This study used an experimental approach by integrating Chat GPT in learning. Data was collected through observation and analysis of student work. The results showed that the implementation of Chat GPT in learning can improve the quality of learning. However, its effectiveness depends on the strategy, namely the need to map clear goals, planned integration, and training lecturers and students on how to use Chat GPT effectively. No less important is ethical awareness in using Chat GPT, namely regarding privacy policies, copyright, and ethical use. On the other hand, users must be critical by accessing various information from diverse sources. This allows students to see from different points of view about a topic. In addition, it is necessary to evaluate information sources where students are trained to evaluate the credibility of information sources provided by Chat GPT.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alnaqbi, N. M., & Fouda, W. (2023). Exploring the Role of ChatGPT and social media in Enhancing Student Evaluation of Teaching Styles in Higher Education Using Neutrosophic Sets. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.200414

Baskara, FX. R. (2023). The Promises and Pitfalls of Using Chat GPT for Self-Determined Learning in Higher Education: An Argumentative Review. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIM Sinjai, 2. https://doi.org/10.47435/sentikjar.v2i0.1825

Bessette, L. S. (2023). This Isn’t Another Piece on ChatGPT. The National Teaching & Learning Forum, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/ntlf.30359

Choon, S. (2022). Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching Post-COVID-19 and higher education1. Journal of Apllied Learning & Teaching, 5(1).

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., & Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4), e202346. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13572

Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in Education and Research: A Critical Examination of Ethical Implication and Solutions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(7), 1–15.

Elkhatat, A. M. (2023). Evaluating the authenticity of ChatGPT responses: a study on text-matching capabilities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00137-0

Fuchs, K. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: is Chat GPT a blessing or a curse? In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1166682

Lin, S.-M., Chung, H.-H., Chung, F.-L., & Lan, Y.-J. (2023). Concerns About Using ChatGPT in Education (Issue August). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40113-8_4

Musthafa, I., & Hermawan, A. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Bahasa Arab. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nugrahani, F. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Cakra Books.

Oguz, F. E., Ekersular, M. N., Sunnetci, K. M., & Alkan, A. (2023). Can Chat GPT be Utilized in Scientific and Undergraduate Studies? Annals of Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03333-8

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Wahid, R., & Hikamudin, E. (2023). Analisis Penggunaan Chat-GPT Oleh Mahasiswa Terhadap Proses Pendidikan di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Pedagogik Indonesia, 1(2), 112–117.

walczak krzysztof, & Cellary Wojciech. (2023). Challenges for Higher Education in the Era of Widespread Access to Generative AI. Economics and Business Review, 9(2), 71–100.

Weimann-Sandig, N. (2023). DIGITAL LITERACY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE – DOES CHAT GPT INTRODUCE THE END OF CRITICAL THINKING IN HIGHER EDUCATION? EDULEARN23 Proceedings, 1. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2023.0011

Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q. L., & Tang, Y. (2023). A Brief Overview of ChatGPT: The History, Status Quo and Potential Future Development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10(5), 1122–1136. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2023.123618

Yilmaz, H., Maxutov, S., Baitekov, A., & Balta, N. (2023). Student Attitudes towards Chat GPT: A Technology Acceptance Model Survey. International Educational Review, 1(1).

Zed, M. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan (Edisi ke-2). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Pengelola: Pusat Pendidikan, LPPM, Universitas Negeri Malang
Jl. Semarang, No 6.
Graha Rektorat Universitas Negeri Malang, Lantai 6